Henry Chawner salts?

PHOTOS REQUIRED - marks + item
MLF
contributor
Posts: 117
Joined: Fri Mar 24, 2006 9:10 am
Location: Edinburgh, UK

Henry Chawner salts?

Postby MLF » Fri Nov 02, 2007 7:30 pm

A lovely pair of salt cellars, seemingly with their original liners:
Image

Both cellars are decorated with stenciling and punctures, although on both the punctures extend for only part of one side, as if leaving a gap for a monogram. On the other side, the decoration extends all - or almost all - of the way. I suppose the cellars were made from a sheet of silver that already had the decoration punched into it, because where the ends join up, the decoration on both cellars is a little rough, and both have one enlarged puncture there.

One cellar appears to have been repaired at some point - the stenciling on one leg is different and somewhat crude compared to that of the other legs.
Image

Who made these cellars, and why are there only two marks on the one piece?
Image Image

I read these as being made in London in 1790 (possibly 1810) and probably by a certain 'HC'. From a distance, the maker's mark looks more like 'EC' but I think the silver ruptured when it was stamped and that is why the first letter is not complete. I'm fairly certain it's an 'H' - in the middle of the mark is a faint vertical line that I believe belongs to the 'H'. It's hard to get a good picture of the mark; this is the best I can do:
Image

Could these cellars have been made by Henry Chawner? They seem... well, a little crude for a silversmith of his standing. And why does one cellar bear only the leopard and the date letter 'P'? (This is not the cellar that had a leg replaced.)

Best wishes

Mikael
.

MLF
contributor
Posts: 117
Joined: Fri Mar 24, 2006 9:10 am
Location: Edinburgh, UK

Postby MLF » Wed Nov 14, 2007 11:46 am

Hello forum,

I wonder if any of you would offer an opinion on these salt cellars - both regarding the maker and the oddity of one cellar bearing only two marks. Could it be that marks were erased after some repair work was carried out that I am not able to spot?

Best wishes

Mikael
.

Granmaa
co-admin
Posts: 1734
Joined: Sun Apr 09, 2006 9:32 am
Location: London
Contact:

Postby Granmaa » Thu Nov 15, 2007 4:42 pm

From the picture, it looks like the marks have been filed away.

I'm sorry, I can't help with the maker.

Miles
.

admin
Site Admin
Posts: 2492
Joined: Fri Apr 01, 2005 6:52 pm

Postby admin » Thu Nov 15, 2007 5:06 pm

Hi MLF,
Is the area of missing marks next to one of the replaces feet?

Tom
.

MLF
contributor
Posts: 117
Joined: Fri Mar 24, 2006 9:10 am
Location: Edinburgh, UK

Postby MLF » Thu Nov 15, 2007 11:43 pm

Hello Miles and Tom,

Thank you so much for your messages. On closer inspection it does look as if some of the marks have been filed away - but very oddly, this is not the cellar that has had a foot replaced, nor do I see any evidence of any past repair jobs having been done on it. It's strange. Even if that was the case, however, would it be normal to file away marks?

Best wishes

Mikael
.

dognose
Site Admin
Posts: 50679
Joined: Thu Dec 29, 2005 12:53 pm
Location: England

Postby dognose » Fri Nov 16, 2007 2:28 pm

Hi Mikael,

Is there any chance that there has been a solder repair that has flowed into the Hallmarks and obscured them, this would account for the file marks as being part of the preparation for soldering.

Regards Trev.
.

admin
Site Admin
Posts: 2492
Joined: Fri Apr 01, 2005 6:52 pm

Postby admin » Fri Nov 16, 2007 2:39 pm

...or the result of trying to level off a sloppy solder flow.
.

JLDoggett
co-admin
Posts: 664
Joined: Fri Oct 26, 2007 3:04 am
Location: New Hampshire

Postby JLDoggett » Fri Nov 16, 2007 4:28 pm

Trev may have a point, if you look to the left side of the two-mark picture, there is a shadow that looks like a shallow curve, this could be the remains of the maker's mark. there is room between it and the city mark to have fitted the quality mark. However why would the soveriegn's head have been removed? It is possible that they were damaged (there is the missing metal (the enlarged punch holes). Those enlarged holes make me wonder if something was once soldered there and removed, or broke off. On the back shown, the solder seam appears to bisect the last section of punch-work (with a solder spill below). The rim and base moulding would have been applied after the sheet was formed into the proper sized oval for the liner. It is possible the smith worked the sheet before the liners arrived and discovered the liners were slightly larger than ordered... There are a lot of possible explainations and questions these raise.
.

MLF
contributor
Posts: 117
Joined: Fri Mar 24, 2006 9:10 am
Location: Edinburgh, UK

Postby MLF » Fri Nov 16, 2007 4:38 pm

Hello Trev and Tom,

I suppose it's possible. I can't tell if the cellar has been repaired at some point but it's perfectly possible - when I look at the other cellar with its replaced foot, the silver is not any less smooth in that area than in other areas - my eye is woefully untrained! I would expect the narrow 'ledge' which the inserts rest on, and which is where the hallmarked are, to have a lot of wear over time.

Thanks for your input!

Mikael
.


Return to “London Hallmarks”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest