Fork manufacturing

Questions on polishing, restoration, conservation + manufacturing techniques
Granmaa
co-admin
Posts: 1734
Joined: Sun Apr 09, 2006 9:32 am
Location: London
Contact:

Fork manufacturing

Postby Granmaa » Fri Mar 09, 2007 12:16 pm

I have three forks which were made in Newcastle in 1827. On two of them there is a little lump in exactly the same place; it is not present on the other. I'd be interested to know what error produced this.

Miles

ImageImage
.

dognose
Site Admin
Posts: 50663
Joined: Thu Dec 29, 2005 12:53 pm
Location: England

Postby dognose » Fri Mar 09, 2007 1:41 pm

Hi Miles,
Are the forks engraved?, if so then possibly this is where the engraver clamped the fork, the mark seems to have caused by a turning action, of course the screw part of the clamp would have had a protective cushion but perhaps this became detached on these two and the engraver had not noticed, just a possibility,
Regards Trev.
.

Granmaa
co-admin
Posts: 1734
Joined: Sun Apr 09, 2006 9:32 am
Location: London
Contact:

Postby Granmaa » Fri Mar 09, 2007 1:52 pm

They are engraved on the back Trev, but they aren't holes: they protrude beyond the surface of the metal.

Miles
.

admin
Site Admin
Posts: 2492
Joined: Fri Apr 01, 2005 6:52 pm

Postby admin » Fri Mar 09, 2007 2:10 pm

Hi Miles,
A small pit in the die would have this effect. Of course, if all three were made with the same die, all three would have it. Perhaps these two did not have proper finishing work applied.

Regards, Tom
.

paulh
contributor
Posts: 449
Joined: Wed Nov 29, 2006 6:02 pm
Location: Cheshire, England

Postby paulh » Wed Mar 14, 2007 6:56 pm

I would agree. THere seems to be an imperfection in the die that was used to apply the pip to the end of the fork. It would be interesting to locate other examples by this maker to see if they were similarly marked.

Paul
.


Return to “Silver Care / Techniques”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests