russia suger box

PHOTOS REQUIRED - marks + item
Johny
Posts: 137
Joined: Sat Oct 14, 2006 9:59 am

russia suger box

Postby Johny » Mon Aug 03, 2020 1:12 pm

Maybe more info about the producer

Image
Image
Image
Image
Image

AG2012
contributor
Posts: 5121
Joined: Fri Apr 13, 2012 9:47 am

Re: russia suger box

Postby AG2012 » Mon Aug 03, 2020 1:52 pm

Hi,
The assayer AM Alexander Mor in St Petersburg.
There were several makers at the time whose initials ended in Latin S.
Difficult to decipher.
Regards

Johny
Posts: 137
Joined: Sat Oct 14, 2006 9:59 am

Re: russia suger box

Postby Johny » Mon Aug 03, 2020 1:56 pm

This is not M.S?

AG2012
contributor
Posts: 5121
Joined: Fri Apr 13, 2012 9:47 am

Re: russia suger box

Postby AG2012 » Mon Aug 03, 2020 2:04 pm

If M.S in this form of the mark,then it matches Mathias Skyytianen who was born in Finland and worked in St Petersburg at the time.

Johny
Posts: 137
Joined: Sat Oct 14, 2006 9:59 am

Re: russia suger box

Postby Johny » Mon Aug 03, 2020 2:06 pm

Thank you for your quick reply

AG2012
contributor
Posts: 5121
Joined: Fri Apr 13, 2012 9:47 am

Re: russia suger box

Postby AG2012 » Mon Aug 03, 2020 2:13 pm

This info is from Skurlov list of St Petersburg makers;family name is Skit,obviously shortened form of silversmith`s Finnish name.
Born in Finland 1820, died 1866,came to St Petersburg to learn in 1843,undermaster 1850.His widow continued his workshop.The mark dates before 1868.Reference numbers of his marks in PL book.
СКИТТ Матиас (р. 1820 г. в Финляндии, ум. в 1866 г.), в 1839 г. приехал учиться в СПб, в 1843 г. подмастерье, в 1850 г. СДМ. Дело продолжала его вдова. Клеймо встречается до 1868 г. Постникова—Лосева: клейма №№ 1801–1803.

Qrt.S
contributor
Posts: 3545
Joined: Fri Feb 27, 2009 9:32 am
Location: Helsinki Finland

Re: russia suger box

Postby Qrt.S » Tue Aug 04, 2020 3:55 am

For the records:
Transliterated names always cause problems. Since I am a Finn I take the liberty to inform his correct Finnish name. Originally it was Mathias Skyytinen but he changed it to Skytt when he came to St.Petersburg in 1839. He became journeyman in 1843. He was born in Parikkala in eastern Finland 13.7.1820, became master in 1850, and died 23.5.1866. His widow Albertina Holmqvist continued the business to 1868.

An interesting thing here is the assayer, Mor or Mitin? Different sources give different info. Mor 1831-1852 and Mitin 1852-1877, another source mentions that Mor would have assayed 1852-1876. Anyway there are two different AM marks registered 1852-1876. Does anybody know what is the case. I would appreciate the correct years.
Thank you in advance.

Ubaranda
contributor
Posts: 496
Joined: Mon Sep 03, 2012 3:36 am

Re: russia suger box

Postby Ubaranda » Tue Aug 04, 2020 8:24 am

Qrt.S wrote:An interesting thing here is the assayer, Mor or Mitin? Different sources give different info. Mor 1831-1852 and Mitin 1852-1877, another source mentions that Mor would have assayed 1852-1876. Anyway there are two different AM marks registered 1852-1876. Does anybody know what is the case. I would appreciate the correct years.
Thank you in advance.


Qrt.S, this is not the first time you ask about this, but you stubbornly do not hear the answers. How else to explain to you? See here:
viewtopic.php?f=46&t=30311
viewtopic.php?f=46&t=52948

Qrt.S
contributor
Posts: 3545
Joined: Fri Feb 27, 2009 9:32 am
Location: Helsinki Finland

Re: russia suger box

Postby Qrt.S » Tue Aug 04, 2020 12:03 pm

@Ubaranda
Yes I know, but not either the last time for the simple reason that Dad states in his message that Mitin assayed 1841-1848 and Mor 1850-1866. How do you explain that I can show two different sootmarks of Mitin from 1852-1877 and 1852-1876. In addition I can show a sootmark from Mor from 1831.
In the old message Dad is requesting AM- marks after 1868. I have two different AM-soot marks 1869-1877. Unfortunately I am unable to show them for the moment. I have no scanner here but I'll try to do it later some other time. So the question remains, When did Mitin and More assay? This case is not solved yet! Please reread the old links. Yes I know I'm stubborn and not satisfied until I have a correct answer based on facts.

Ubaranda
contributor
Posts: 496
Joined: Mon Sep 03, 2012 3:36 am

Re: russia suger box

Postby Ubaranda » Tue Aug 04, 2020 1:34 pm

Hi Qrt.S!
I never saw the "AM" original assay marks before 1851 and after 1865. It is very interesting to look at your scans.
Thanks in advance.
Regards.

Goldstein
contributor
Posts: 1256
Joined: Sat Dec 12, 2015 9:53 am

Re: russia suger box

Postby Goldstein » Thu Aug 06, 2020 4:14 am

The usual cheap excuses when it comes to putting facts on the table. Either there are copy right problems or the scanner is not there or does not work, ect .. Even the cheapest phones today have a powerful camera ..... what's the problem?

Qrt.S
contributor
Posts: 3545
Joined: Fri Feb 27, 2009 9:32 am
Location: Helsinki Finland

Re: russia suger box

Postby Qrt.S » Thu Aug 06, 2020 4:51 am

@Goldstein
A most stupid comment, yes I have a phone, but since you are so eager to always blame me, neither the book nor the scanner is here where I am. Got it!

Goldstein
contributor
Posts: 1256
Joined: Sat Dec 12, 2015 9:53 am

Re: russia suger box

Postby Goldstein » Thu Aug 06, 2020 5:13 am

Grandmother always said: "a kicked worm writhes ..."

Qrt.S
contributor
Posts: 3545
Joined: Fri Feb 27, 2009 9:32 am
Location: Helsinki Finland

Re: russia suger box

Postby Qrt.S » Sat Aug 08, 2020 10:52 am

Here are the AM-soot marks I promised to show you. Back to my question, who is it, Mitin or Mor/Moor???

Image
ImageImage


Return to “Russian Silver”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 11 guests