Postby buckler » Wed Oct 18, 2017 5:31 pm
I think it is almost certain to be the mark of James Stamp and John Baker - despite it being prior to registration . These things happened in the less well regulated 18th century !
From the will of James Stamp it is clear that the two partners were related, probably cousins.
The facts
John Baker was apprenticed 3 July 1740 to Theophilis Spendelowe
He was free in 1747, so may well have had marks in the lost smallworkers register prior to 1756.
James Stamp was free of the Goldsmiths by redemption in 1764 , so could well have had a career in another trade prior to 1764– we cannot assume that he was younger than Baker. Indeed as the senior partner he was probably the elder.
My theory
James Stamp and John Baker formed a partnership some time in 1760 (the date letter covers 1759 /60), taking over the sole tradership of John Baker . Goldsmiths Hall were accustomed to receiving items for assay from John Baker and did not notice that their goods were now stamped IS/IB .
The partners belatedly registered the joint mark in 1764
The partnership did not last long - dissolved around 1770
James Stamp was made a Liveryman in late 1771, only 7 years from his freedom, so was probably of both mature years and greatly respected.