Postby dragonflywink » Tue Aug 05, 2014 2:14 pm
Durgin was issued the patent for 'Chatham' (#D46717) on Dec. 1, 1914, so 1915 would be a logical introduction date - the term of protection could be as short as 3½ years, but this one was for the maximum 14 years. Noting the patent on the item tends to turn up on the earlier dies for a pattern, but the dies could have been used long after the patent had expired. Don't believe Chatham was a particularly popular pattern, Gorham may have used the original dies for decades - on the other hand, Durgin's 1910 'Fairfax' pattern was very popular and is found marked as Durgin and also as Gorham (like most major manufacturers, Gorham offered once-a-year special orders of discontinued/inactive patterns). To my eye, the monogram seems a bit old-fashioned and suspect earlier production, but hard to tell. Weight codes have been used since the late 19th century, I haven't found them particularly common past the early 20th century - Gorham used at least four different weight codes, as well as other letter codes (some remaining a mystery). Just as an additional note - Gorham date marks are extremely uncommon on flatware.
Regarding Gorham's purchase of Durgin, don't have time to delve into my references at the moment, but if I recall correctly, Gorham didn't actually acquire Durgin until the mid '20s, when Gorham bought the Silversmiths Co., a holding company founded by Gorham's president Edward Holbrook which, from the early 20th century, held controlling interest in a number of silver manufacturers, including Whiting and Durgin, and conveniently enough, Gorham. Believe Durgin continued operating as a separate division until production was moved to the Gorham factory in 1931.
~Cheryl