Postby Cuznerfan » Mon Jun 10, 2013 7:09 pm
I'm sorry to hear you have not had a reply from the Birmingham Assay Office (i.e. us) hopefully this will go some way to redressing the balance. People put too much emphasis on books like 'Bradburys' and 'Jacksons' all permutations of shield shape could not be included, just like they tend to be silver oriented- the shape sometimes differ from metal to metal and size of mark i.e a large piece of silver may have a different punch shape than a gold ring. This is the reason we keep a marks register, every year all assay punches kept in the office are punched onto a plate and so if a query arises the relevant plate can be compared to the mark in question. I recognise this particular mark on the actual punch (lower case gothic 'i') the dot merges with the stem of the i making it look like a gothic 'f' especially when the mark is worn. People don't seem to understand how huge the Birmingham Assay Office was at the end of the nineteenth century, I am currently compiling a book of maker's marks c.1890-1920- which will probably take the next 5 years and will include some 4500 makers! Queries regarding makers marks are admirably being dealt with by my colleague Lin Moran (in addition to her full time job as Registration Clerk). Unfortunately Sally Baggott has moved on to another job (a good couple of years ago), and her replacement is concentrating on Educational matters. Many of the queries dealt with by Sally aside from just looking up makers in the register were team efforts and the team's still here! I'll quite happily answer any 'Brummie' related questions if I can. Kind regards
Craig