Postby Qrt.S » Sat Apr 14, 2012 1:53 am
Generally as Oel already stated but as also said a poorly made object does not automatically make it a fake, on the contrary- Today can an object made in extreme quality well be a fake. My way of approaching this "dilemma" is the following. When I see an interesting object, I give it a quick general "look". If it pleases me, I look at the marks. If I'm satisfied with them, I investigate the object more thoroughly. If I'm not satisfied with the marks, I let it be irrespective of its outstanding quality or whatever other reason.
It is the one and the same question repeated here many many times. The fakers do not bother to investigate how marks should look like, where they should be, what marks were used, how and when. Why do it, it is unnecessary because some person not knowing anything about marks will still buy the object fascinated by its "beauty". Such a person cannot either separate a cast mark from a punched mark. Whatever that looks like marks will do and Cyrillic letters that is the BIG thing for some.
Regarding Russian silver it is advisable to remember that unidentified marks, insufficient/incorrect marking or missing marks etc. are always an alarming red flag. That has nothing to do with the items quality, good or poor. Sometimes it is also good to ask yourself the following question if you see a large amount of e.g. enameled Russian objects for sale, i. e. "Where do they all come from, what is their origin?" The story behind them told by the seller you can usually throw to the dogs. It is not forbidden to use your brains, never been!
Just caught my mind an expression used by Zolotnik: "A fool and his money are soon separated!"
About Fabergé. Objects on the market today "made" by Fabergé are up to 90% fakes and good fakes they are.