19c Mustard Pot; No Leopards head in Mark. Explanation?

PHOTOS REQUIRED - marks + item
ArtsdeTable
Posts: 7
Joined: Sun Mar 08, 2009 8:13 am
Location: France

19c Mustard Pot; No Leopards head in Mark. Explanation?

Postby ArtsdeTable » Sun Mar 08, 2009 8:30 am

As you see from the photo of the marks, there is no leopard's head. Does this mean it is not solid silver? The letter corresponds to 1894/95 (London).
The maker's mark is apparently WE, whom I cannot find. The E looks less like an E when magnified. Can anyone identify the maker or explain the missing leopard?
Thanks

Image

Image

Image[/url]
.

dognose
Site Admin
Posts: 50679
Joined: Thu Dec 29, 2005 12:53 pm
Location: England

Postby dognose » Sun Mar 08, 2009 9:22 am

Hi,

Welcome to the Forum.

Whereabouts on the item are these marks positioned?

Trev.
.

ArtsdeTable
Posts: 7
Joined: Sun Mar 08, 2009 8:13 am
Location: France

Postby ArtsdeTable » Sun Mar 08, 2009 9:56 am

Thanks. They are under the lid. It occurs to me that if it were silver plate there would be some sign of the underlying metal by now; under the bottom are some scratches, one gives a number the other looks like script but is unreadable even under a magnifying glass. Hmm, perhaps if I photographed it and really blew it up....... The bottom appears to have been soldered to the barrel with copper as there are traces of green at the join.
regards, thanks for your help.
.

dognose
Site Admin
Posts: 50679
Joined: Thu Dec 29, 2005 12:53 pm
Location: England

Postby dognose » Sun Mar 08, 2009 10:12 am

Hi,

No, I have no doubt that your item is silver, the marks in this position are exactly what one would expect to find under the lid, as they are a secondary set of marks. The full set was probably positioned near the top of the main body of the piece, and have probably been worn away, a careful inspection may show some trace.
The loss of marks on such things as mustard pots is not uncommon, they were an item that was used on a daily basis, but not washed as spoons, forks etc. would have been, so would have been polished a lot more often, hence the loss of marks.

The maker I suspect is possibly William Edwards, hopefully someone with better references will confirm/deny.

Trev.
.

ArtsdeTable
Posts: 7
Joined: Sun Mar 08, 2009 8:13 am
Location: France

Postby ArtsdeTable » Sun Mar 08, 2009 10:29 am

Hello, thanks very much, have found traces, must look more closely in future; just a beginner. Thank you for your interest and your time.
.

georgiansilver
contributor
Posts: 415
Joined: Thu Jan 12, 2006 5:50 am
Location: Gainsborough, Lincs

Postby georgiansilver » Sun Mar 08, 2009 8:22 pm

Suggest it might be more likely that William Evans was manafacturer but be guided by the masses... LOL.
.

dognose
Site Admin
Posts: 50679
Joined: Thu Dec 29, 2005 12:53 pm
Location: England

Postby dognose » Mon Mar 09, 2009 5:26 am

Hi,

Yes, I believe Mike's attribution is probably correct, William Evans.

I originally took my possible attribution of Edwards from 'The Colman Collection of Silver Mustard Pots' Item 122 (they also mention the possibility of Evans). This presumably would be William Walker Evans, trading under the name of his father, William Evans, who was born c.1820, so probably retired or deceased by this time.
Interestingly John Culme in his 'Directory of Gold & Silversmiths' has a final listing for William Walker Evans in 1880, so maybe this item was made by a third generation of the Evans.

Trev.
.

MCB
moderator
Posts: 2133
Joined: Wed Mar 12, 2008 2:43 pm
Location: UK

Postby MCB » Mon Mar 09, 2009 11:01 am

Hello,

The oval mark is perhaps the one identified at item 14710 of Culme's Directory as registered in 1864 by a William Evans of Sekforde Street succeeding his father John as a manufacturing silversmith in 1867 and disposing of the business to F A Burridge around 1894.

Mike
.

dognose
Site Admin
Posts: 50679
Joined: Thu Dec 29, 2005 12:53 pm
Location: England

Postby dognose » Mon Mar 09, 2009 12:42 pm

Hi Mike,

Ah..I see it now.
Unfortunately, I have not got Vol.2 of John Culme's Directory and it sounds like I have the wrong William Evans. There are three of them in Vol.1, but only two listed as William, I missed the one listed under John.

Many thanks for the correction, I must invest in Vol.2.

Regards Trev.
.


Return to “London Hallmarks”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests