aka E. J. Siltberg-Stanhope & Co., and E.S. Stanhope & Co.
14, Fishergate, later, 10, Colliergate, later, 7, Spurriergate, later, 17, Coney Street, York

Transit box - E.S. Stanhope & Co.
Enoch Siltberg was a Swede who arrived in York following employment with the important watch and chronometer makers and Royal Warrant holders, E. Dent & Co. (see: http://www.dentlondon.com/about/history.php for history of this firm). In the early 1880's he was located at 14, Fishergate, and in 1883 he removed to 10, Colliergate. The following year, 1884, saw him relocate again, this time to 7, Spurriergate and by 1900 he had moved yet again, this time to 17, Coney Street, with the business now styled E. Siltberg Stanhope & Co.
On the 14th July 1904 Enoch John Siltberg Stanhope took the Oath of Allegiance (Promissory Oaths Act 1868). The notification of this event appeared in the 'London Gazette' of 2nd December 1904 and recorded Siltberg Stanhope's address as Yew Villa, Heworth, York. It was probably in the next few years after this event that the Siltberg part of the name was dropped, as with the advent of WWI, there were many who anglicized their names as anyone with a 'foreign sounding' name may have become a target for vandels. The was especially true in this part of the country following the bombardment of Scarborough by the German fleet in 1914.
The transit box illustrated shows the the business was later styled as E.S. Stanhope & Co., perhaps now in the hands of another member of the family.
To the Editor of the Watchmaker, Jeweler, Silversmith and Optician
The Case of Mr. Siltberg
Sir,—I notice in your paper of the 1st ult., that you have referred to a case tried at the last assizes in York between Mr. Enoch John Siltberg of York, and Mr. C. E. Simpson, and, as your report does not contain a full account of the facts, I am sure you will be glad to receive the following :
In December last Mr. Siltberg was looking out for suitable premises in a central position in York, the premises which he then occupied having been bought by the Corporation. By many misrepresentations Mr. Simpson induced him to purchase a house and shop in Spurriergate for £2,000. Subsequently Mr. Siltberg ascertained that Mr. Simpson s statements were untrue, and that the true value of the property was much below £1,000, Mr. Simpson having purchased it four years ago for £650. Mr. Siltberg then made an offer to Mr. Simpson to pay him £50 to relieve him of his contract. Mr. Siltberg was prepared to increase this to £150, hut Mr. Simpson flatly refused to rescind the contract. Mr. Siltberg took proceedings in the High Court of Justice to relieve himself of the contract, and the case was heard at York before the Lord Chief Justice, and ended in Mr. Siltberg losing his £100 deposit and paying £25 to Mr. Simpson, but what most he wished was granted by the Court, namely, that he should not be compelled to take the property, that being the purpose for which he commenced his action.
I trust to your fairness to insert this letter, and remain
yours faithfully,
J. H. Turner.
Source: The Watchmaker, Jeweller and Silversmith - 2nd October 1893
Trev.