Postby Francais » Fri Apr 11, 2014 8:51 pm
I guess I need to correct the penultimate response.
First of all while initials are most commonly read top to bottom and left to right, as almost anyone should guess, They are also sometimes read left to right and top to bottom. So in this case I would probably start with CLGD I wold also try other combinations although I obviously would not try starting with D or G. Then you have the problem of compound last names, so Legarde might be L or LG. The later is often the case with 4 letter marks. Then there is the possibility that some letters have nothing to do with the name, but are symbols. For example another post had a mark beginning with N but it was not part of the name, but a Napoleonic N a symbol.
I believe my dates for the last mark are correct 1783-86 as from 1786 -1789 the mark should have been a birds head.
I should also explain the item COULD be called a saupoudoir or at least a dozen other names including ones for powdered sugar, hair powder, or sand. I chose the word sander as I thought that is the most likely choice, and easily understood. If it were still in a nécessaire its original intended use could perhaps be determined. On top of that it could have been used as different things at different times. I guessed the size was too small for sugar, except for a very small service, the same for hair powder. Also hair powder went out of use far before sand. As far as nomenclature a sander could be called a poudrier, boite à poudre, boite à sable, poudrier de bureau, or my favorite sablier d'écritoire. Whenever you use a term in French another French person will use a different word. So if you go into a French restaurant and you order a carafe of plain tap water, the waiter will use a different word, if you say carafe, he will say, pichet, if you say pichet, he will say car d'eau.
So I say sander, if there is such a word, as ink stand parts are generally easier to sell than hair powder containers or individual powdered sugar shakers.
As an aside, I really don't mind being corrected. That's how we learn, but when I am constantly "corrected" and the correction is just another opinion, and wrong to boot, I find it a waste of time. I would ask those who want to correct me, double check, to see if you are right. Please. Instead of wasting my time writing this I could have tried to find the mark.
Maurice