Postby Traintime » Wed Mar 07, 2018 12:56 am
Gorham is a likely yes, for at least plated wares and maybe sterling. Though Wallace and the components of International turn up more often as makers marks, Gorham did produce naval related services at least as early as the 1890's. The army related transport service (ships) began to order topmarked china around the time of the Spanish-American War, so accompanying silverware is likely there (the name changes over time USATS, USAT, Transportation Corps...). Gorham may turn up on a published contractor list (free on-line access to antiquated navy publications pop up), but a commercial supplier's name might be more likely...companies like Dohrman or Pick turn up. [Un-marked flatwares exist and perhaps could be linked to Gorham.] In addition, Contributor's Notes section has some references about Gorham increasing their employee base for war related work during WWI...not necessarily silver related, possibly other materials like munitions.
Not sure about Durgin. They did issue a copper-based war service medal in 1919. Perhaps they were using up surplus war materials used to produce other wares. Many firms were forced to temporarily shift to war production (we seem to know more about the effect on the toymakers industry than the silvermakers). After the war,(1919 & 1920), Durgin and Gorham made sterling teasets for Bailey, Banks, and Biddle with the West Point emblem dated, but these may not be government contracts.
Hopefully, if someone finds some items they'll let us know. If they were made before the big switch to stainless steel, then topmarked unit china sets would seem to suggest a silverware pattern should exist to go with it.