
The set comprises a tea pot, creamer and sugar bowl.
NOT SURE IF THERE WERE BALL FEET. Have seen the same pattern (plate,though) by Garrard without ball feet, as well as many similar patterns by other makers without feet, even if the base is much narrower than this and the bottom not even raised.But still in doubt whether ball feet were probably removed (one or two damaged and then easier to remove them all than repairing).On the other hand, it would mean a lot of filing off and polishing.
But the following details speak AGAINST ball feet:
1. Fine scratching at the base rim, commensurate with age, and use over many years, unless ball feet were removed decades ago.
2. No sign of filing and no remnants of solder, the base looks intact in all pieces and the base is raised on the lowest belt of silver.
3. The form of the base,tall enough, speaks against ball feet in all pieces; esthetically consistnet with the form. Ball feet would look grotesque and really not neccessary with already raised and rather tall base; but still not sure.
You can help is you have seen the same Garrard pattern.
Thanks for helping.