Incorrect silver pattern description in web page

[newking]

The web page "Gorham Flatware Patterns ~ Online Encyclopedia of Silver Marks, Hallmarks & Makers' Marks" at <http://www.925-1000.com/patterns_Gorham.html> shows a photo of Gorham's King George pattern, patented 1894, incorrectly described as Gorham's New Queens pattern (NQ photo shown below. This pattern is listed in Turner's book as patented c.1895, but all pieces I've seen & have are marked "pat.1899"). My question is, how can this web page be corrected?
.

[Traintime]

All the Gorham Sterling King patterns including I, II, III & George (with 1909 catalog pages) and the dates they included: https://www.sterlingflatwarefashions.co ... ham11.html

[dragonflywink]

Hi - welcome to the forums. Can only say that I agree that the pattern shown as 'New Queens' is actually 'King George'. Carpenter and the JCK Index also show 'New Queens' as introduced in 1895...

~Cheryl