Postby SilverSurfer » Wed Aug 13, 2008 12:20 am
There is a problem in that how might an unmarked piece be attributed to Britain/Scotland. For a reliable attribution, the pattern would have to be strongly identified to a certain area or maker. That's a tall order, especially for flatware, which is most of what I collect. For example, there was a fair amount of unmarked American flatware that much resembles Scottish make, the Oar Pattern (shoulderless early Fiddle Pattern) in particular. As opposed to this, I have a number of provincial Scottish pieces, including some outright duty dodgers (have to admire that old smuggler, William Jamieson of Aberdeen, I hope he kept his head), but they all have some type of mark, if only a maker's mark and/or pseudo town hallmark. An unmarked flatware piece in the Brit/American form would almost always have to be attributed to an American origin, unless there were essentially irrefutable shape characteristics traceable to a specific Brit region, town or maker. I suspect that to be a very rare occurrence.
SS
.