Postby agphile » Sun Aug 09, 2015 6:22 pm
I suppose I should't really rise to the bait. If you are right to imply that the nutmeg grater is a relatively recent replica with what may be a fantasy crest (I'm not so sure), there is little point in debating what the crest represents. Be that as it may, I’m afraid I’m not convinced by your arguments for a tiger. When I compare the crest with actual examples of a demi lion, a demi tiger, a demi leopard and a demi Talbot (hound), all rampant, it looks more like the lion than anything else.
It does not help that the engraving is not of the highest quality. of course, and, whatever the animal, it would also be necessary to identify the device above its head in order to link the crest to a family. I can’t come up with anything better than the tips of a coronet/crown, on the basis that in a small engraving some detail may be absent, but am certainly not confident I am right.
Anyhow, I guess it is up to Trev or his friend to decide whether any of our thoughts actually add anything to what they already know or help them take matters further.
By the way, just for clarification on the side issue of confusion between lion and leopard: as a technical term in heraldry leopard meant a lion passant gardant and had nothing to do with the leopard as an animal. Thus, for example, the leopard’s head in English hallmarks is actually a lion’s head, i.e. the head alone of a lion passant gardant. This can lead to linguistic confusion as to whether we are talking about the leopard as a real animal in its own right or as a lion in a particular posture but I don’t think it means there is also confusion about how to represent the animal once it is clear which one is meant.
Here I go, posting again when it is past bedtime in this corner of the world. Forgive any resultant lack of clarity or excess of verbosity in my rambling.