Postby amena » Mon Feb 15, 2016 7:26 am
I was hoping that someone more experienced than me would give a more authoritative answer, but at this point my answer will be better than nothing
On the book by Victor Denaro ,: "The Goldsmiths of Malta and Their marks", on page 122 we read:
In February 1800, Captain Alexander Ball, R. N., who had been elected Chief of the Maltese, found it expedient to appoint a Consul for Goldsmiths and another for Silversmiths in the territory occupied by the Insurgents. These must doubtlessly have adopted their own assay-mark for use in the area under their jurisdiction. It is more than probable that the mark employed showed a "clenched fist", a sign of defiance, which continued in use until 1801 when It was altered to an "open hand" ............. ... The letters R or M and,perhaps, F were always coupled with this mark.
However, on page 37 we read:
Nor do we know whether the stamp used by the consuls in the territory occupied by the Maltese insurgents Is that of the clenched fist used between 1800 and 1809, as no detail of the stamp was given to Captain Ball's bando of 1800.
Maybe it's a misprint?
There is a bit 'of confusion, but we must say that it is reasonable that the years of French occupation and the Valletta blockade were a bit' confused.
More reliable information from different books would be enlightening.
Amena