In a review of an iten in a Bonham's sale in 2003, Daniel Bexfield says this "A George III Irish Provincial soup ladle probably by John Humphreys or John Hillery; Cork, circa 1780, (Makers mark only IH without pellet struck three times), broad Old English shaped stem chased along it's length with trailing flowers below a rococo cartouche engraved with crest of a martlet surmounting arm, couped, fesswise, the scalloped bowl chased with a large leaf and scroll motif below an acanthus leaf, the latter chased to the drop of bowl (small solder repair to split at edge of bowl), 38.5cm. 6.25oz."
Unfortunately, while the spoon is shown, there is no photo of the hallmark and Bonham's online results don't go back that far. What I find interesting is the mention of the maker's mark without pellet. Most auctioneers seem to cover themselves by saying IH is John Hillery or John Humphries (seems to be spelt Humphries or Humphreys depending on source). Now I have just purchased a set of six silver teaspoons attributed to John Humphries but the marks are quite badly rubbed. The maker's mark is struck twice with STERLING in between. However, there does seem to be a pellet between the I and H although distorted (refer middle spoon in image). So, I'm wondering whether one maker has IH (without pellet) and the other I.H (with pellet) but which mark belongs to which maker I have no idea and also what mark did John Hillery's son, also John Hillery, use?
