Thomas William Dee BATON

PHOTOS REQUIRED - marks + item
Post Reply
panatha
Posts: 118
Joined: Mon Sep 01, 2014 12:33 pm

Thomas William Dee BATON

Post by panatha »

Thomas William Dee 1895 LONDON.
Right?
Thanks in advance
Image
Image
Image
silvermakersmarks
co-admin
Posts: 1717
Joined: Tue Apr 09, 2013 9:22 am
Location: Hertfordshire, UK
Contact:

Re: Thomas William Dee BATON

Post by silvermakersmarks »

No, this is Thomas William Daniels, who registered a series of marks between 1883 and 1912. There is also a very similar mark for Thomas William Dobson registered on 22 March 1886 but which is noted as "defaced" on 1 April 1886, presumably when the Assay Office realised that it was the same as Daniels's. Daniels first registered as a small worker but in later registrations he is a stick mounter.

Phil
panatha
Posts: 118
Joined: Mon Sep 01, 2014 12:33 pm

Re: Thomas William Dee BATON

Post by panatha »

silvermakersmarks wrote:No, this is Thomas William Daniels, who registered a series of marks between 1883 and 1912. There is also a very similar mark for Thomas William Dobson registered on 22 March 1886 but which is noted as "defaced" on 1 April 1886, presumably when the Assay Office realised that it was the same as Daniels's. Daniels first registered as a small worker but in later registrations he is a stick mounter.

Phil
Thanks a lot Phil.
You know what year is "u"?
Regards Tom
silvermakersmarks
co-admin
Posts: 1717
Joined: Tue Apr 09, 2013 9:22 am
Location: Hertfordshire, UK
Contact:

Re: Thomas William Dee BATON

Post by silvermakersmarks »

You were right with 1895 so I didn't think to mention it.
Post Reply

Return to “London Hallmarks”