the marks look authentic - the salver and engraving looks too young. Assayer: Jaschinkov (Jaschenkov) Aleksandr I. 1797-1825 The other 2 (?) punches are unknown to me.
Well... The problem here is why do we have two maker's marks? The MFK mark stands for Mathias Friedrich Krey/Kray, a Dane who moved to St. Petersburg and became master 3. September 1794. It is known that he worked still in 1804. The second mark ИЛ, however, is a mystery. No trace of it in my records and why is there a second mark? Are there any signs of repair on salver? Maybe it is the initials of the engraver...?
Hi, What about Tremolierstich on Russian silver? Just curious.There was a thread with the same question;unsolved. If you have a single doubt about the salver, you should not bid, as you will never be completely satisfied with it. I have my doubts about 1801. Regards
in my opinion a socalled "heart transplant". The marks of an old spoon(s) were soldered into this cheap, modern salver. Plus the "overkill" of one mark more than neccesary and as a super bonus the Tremolierst(r)ich. Must be from Poland.
when Goldstein said that the marks look authentic but the salver and engraving look too young I thought to a marks transposition but I have just a general question shouldn't the welding be visible? I mean, to do not melt everything the welding should have lower silver content, and this should lead to a visible welding contour... am I right or am I wrong?
There is a point in what Goldstein is stating. The marks could be transposed because they are undoubtedly on an odd place. On a salver/tray the marks are usually on the rim's backside. A transposed mark can not be welded but soldered. Anyway, when done by a skilled craftsman the "seam" is more or less invisible. It is possible to reveal it by breathe on it and for a moment it becomes visible. But easy to say difficult to accomplish...