Page 1 of 1

Is it Fake or Not? 4

Posted: Fri Jun 24, 2011 4:49 am
by Smokanabeach
4th item! Enjoy ;-))

Image

My research: Assayer: Alexander Virjohovsky, 1899, Kostroma (A & B, right side of the zolotnik mark); Maker: Undertermined, Kiev 1880-1908 (IP?)

Thanks for your help ;-)

Re: Is it Fake or Not? 4

Posted: Fri Jun 24, 2011 8:35 am
by Child
You are right!

Re: Is it Fake or Not? 4

Posted: Fri Jun 24, 2011 8:55 am
by Zolotnik
Hi Smokanabeach -

Townmark: Kiev 1899-1908
Assayer: Aleksandr Kasimirowitsch Virschikov
Maker: B.P (?), unrecorded

Regards
Zolotnik

Re: Is it Fake or Not? 4

Posted: Fri Jun 24, 2011 4:29 pm
by Smokanabeach
Thank you again!!!!

Smoka

Re: Is it Fake or Not? 4

Posted: Sat Jun 25, 2011 4:45 am
by Juke
Hi!

The maker is Г.Р, also an unknown master, known to make stopki's (vodka beakers). Here is another mark of his:

Image

Regards,
Juke

Re: Is it Fake or Not? 4

Posted: Sat Jun 25, 2011 5:12 am
by Smokanabeach
Thank you Juke!

That the same mark, you're right!

Uncredible the number of unknown silver makers in Russia... all the more for item of the late 19th!

Re: Is it Fake or Not? 4

Posted: Sat Jun 25, 2011 10:03 am
by piette
Hello Smokanabeach,
The reason for the high number of unknown makers of Russian silver is because around the time of the Revolution, so many important papers and documents were 'taking up space' and so as a result they were just burned, as they were regarded as unimportant at the time.
Regards,
Piette

Re: Is it Fake or Not? 4

Posted: Sat Jun 25, 2011 11:44 am
by Qrt.S
Actually it was around 1872-73 when the Russian archives were loaded with old papers and the authorities sold/burned due to lack of space a lot of filed materials as waste paper among those the old goldsmiths' registers, which were considered as unnecessary documentation. Of course the revolution probably did the rest. Today we unfortunately face this problem with quite a lot of nameless but not necessary unknown Russian masters. That is a big problem.