Postby Lea » Sun Mar 09, 2014 5:45 am
"Until now it has been rather unclear what is the content of this ЮММЕТ- alloy/metal."
Your statement shows exactly where the problem lies: 'I-OMMET' is not an 'alloy/metal': there is not more 'content' to it than any other maker's name/stamp. It simply means that it was made by the Mstera Jewellers factory. The closest it comes to declaring anything about content is the MET part, which was a commonly used designation for non-precious metal. It doesn't even say what sort of base metal was used. Just think of I-OMMET as a name, nothing more, nothing to do with content.
I first became curious about I-OMMET and melchior when I started collecting what I call Russian tourist salts. They all had the I-OMMET stamp, plus price stamps. Some Russian lists/sites suggested that it was a name/factory mark, but it wasn't until I found some of these salts in their original boxes that I learned for certain that they were made by Mstera Jewellers, which was clearly marked on the bottom of the boxes, which also specified that the metal used was melchior, which is indeed a copper-nickel-zinc alloy. Some of the boxes from later dates also stated that they had been silverplated and the amount of silver used to do this. The silverplating seems to have started sometime in the '60s, but I don't have an exact date.
It does seem strange that there doesn't seem to be any reference in print to I-OMMET, because stuff with that stamp was, as you state, very widely used. I suppose it could be for that very reason that the stamp is not documented, just like our generic cutlery that is only stamped 'IKEA'. It just wasn't special enough to be celebrated, lol!
I've been trying to post a picture of the bottom of the box, which clearly says 'metal melchior' in Russian, but it is now around 5:30 a.m. here and I can't quite get my brain to figure out how. I shall see if I have more success after I've been to sleep, and then had my morning coffee. :-)
Hyvasti, Lea