Postby Qrt.S » Wed Jan 13, 2010 5:31 am
Mind my saying, but there is something wrong in the logic here. Firstly, the assay mark, the rabota, was superseded with a new assay mark on 14th of July 1959. The new mark was the Soviet star with the hammer and sickle. How can you then have a dismissed rabota mark on an object made 1967?
Secondly, the company ПФ7 was located in Kostroma, in that case why does the assay mark show the Greek letter Khi, looks like an X, but is the Latin ”letter sound” Kh, which is the symbol for Vilinius in Lithuania? (Postnikov already mentioned that) Also the letter Kappa (K) reminds of an X. That would be Odessa, also strange? I think we can forget Odessa, but Vilnius is much closer to Tallinn than both Odessa and Kostroma.
You have indicated that there seems to be two marks to the left in the assay mark. Are you really sure? You see that is impossible, you should have one mark only. Anyway, one of the marks looks like an 8. That could be the Greek letter beta, it looks like an 8, especially if it is unclear as you mention.
Fourthly, the rabota assay mark was the first new Soviet silver assay mark as from June 1927. In the beginning the cartouche, its called “lopakti” i.e. shovel in Russia, of the assay mark indicated that the whole object weights less than 10 grams? But between 1954-1958 it change to the general assay mark for gold, silver and platinum. Your cup hardly weights less than 10 gram, which to me dates it to 1957 (Number 7 in the maker’s mark). Now we have a partly match with the assay mark (before 1959). But then we have a mismatch because the factory wasn’t founded yet. Strange???
Maybe you should take a closer look to the marks….?
These were only my personal opinions without any commitment whatsoever…
PS. Postnikov seems to tease you :-). His shown objects and your cup are not comparable at all, not even close. It’s a day and night difference….mind my saying, sorry :-)
Have a nice day
.