Postby dognose » Wed Mar 04, 2015 6:07 am
Clever Swindler Uses Telephone to Get Merchandise in Names of Well-Rated Customers
The clever swindler who uses the telephone in an attempt to get goods in the name of prominent people is again operating in New York, and jewelers in the metropolis and vicinity are warned to be especially careful about delivering goods in response to telephone messages unless they positively know the party into whose hands the merchandise is given. Some time ago 'The Jewelers' Circular' told how Reed & Barton had received orders over the 'phone ostensibly from General Manager Hedley, of the Interborough system, only to find on delivering the goods that Mr. Hedley had never ordered them. The trick was attempted again last week at the downtown office of the Gorham Co., 15 Maiden Lane, and so well were the plans laid that had it not been for the unusual carefulness of Manager Little, the company would have lost between $1,500 and $2,000 worth of jewelry.
The thief laid his plans a number of weeks ago when he called at the store of the Gorham Co. and stated that he wanted to give some diamonds to his wife upon the celebration of some event, and looked over the stock. He picked out certain goods which particularly pleased him, valued at between $1,500 and $2,000, and taking the numbers of the articles said that he would call again or that they would hear from him.
The man called up on the 'phone Friday to find out if the goods were still to be had and was informed that they were. He then stated that his name was Van Wyck and that he was a regular customer of the house, and he would like to know if they would let him have the goods to take home over Sunday in order that the final decision might be made.
The name the man gave, W. P. Van Wyck, is that of a regular customer of the house, well known to the manager, and the man was answered that this might possibly be arranged if he would call for the goods. He said be would come in the following day, Saturday. Saturday the concern received another telephone message from the alleged Mr. Van Wyck, stating that it would be impossible for him to come over himself, but that he would send over a messenger for the goods.
Up to this time there had been nothing at all in the transaction that excited the suspicion of the firm, but when Manager Little heard that a telegraph messenger was there to receive the goods for Mr. Van Wyck he refused to send them without making some investigation. He called in the telegraph messenger and found that he had a regular order on the letterhead of J. F. Newcomb & Co., printers at 441 Pearl St., of which the real Mr. Van Wyck is a member.
Even then Mr. Little was not satisfied, so he interrogated the boy, and asked him where he had seen Mr. Van Wyck. The boy answered that Mr. Van Wyck was at lunch at Stewart's on Chambers St. Mr. Little decided that he would not give the boy the goods, but detained him for a while longer while he continued his investigations.
Evidently annoyed at the boy's delay, the thief called up the Gorham people, got Mr. Little on the wire, stating that he was Mr. Van Wyck and asking if the messenger had got there. Mr. Little apologized for the seeming delay and told him that the boy was there and would start with the goods at once. The last telephone message was apparently so frank that Mr. Little might have been deceived but for the fact that he knew Mr. Van Wyck's voice and that of the speaker at the end of the wire did not sound like him.
However, in order to take no chances he sent one of his own messengers over to Mr. Van Wyck's office with the goods and gave the telegraph messenger boy a note stating that the goods were being forwarded direct to the office. As soon as he had sent the goods, however, Mr. Little got Mr. Van Wyck's office on the wire and notified the bookkeeper in charge that a package was coming over there which was to be delivered to Mr. Van Wyck personally and to nobody else.
It was well this was done, for a few minutes after the bookkeeper in Mr. Van Wyck's office was called upon the telephone (apparently by the swindler), who notified him that it was "the Gorham Co." on the other end and that they had delivered to the office a package by mistake and that they were sending a messenger boy for it to take up to Mr. Van Wyck's home. In a few minutes a messenger boy appeared, but the bookkeeper refused to give him the package.
In the meantime the real Mr. Van Wyck was reached on the telephone at his home, and from him it was learned that he had ordered no goods whatsoever, knew nothing about the case and could not account for the fact that the swindler had obtained a letterhead of his firm, except on the theory that he had called at the office some time during Mr. Van Wyck's absence and stolen it.
Detectives were put on the case immediately, but the swindler had not been apprehended up to the time 'The Jewelers' Circular' went to press. The clever way in which he had laid his plans and his daring in trying to regain the package after he had learned that it had been sent to Mr. Van Wyck's office stamped the man as a crook of unusual ability and nerve. It is, therefore, believed that he has probably laid plans for similar thefts from other jewelers, working in the name of prominent people or those having charge accounts with the firm selected as a victim.
Source: The Jewelers' Circular - 21st November 1917
Trev.