Postby dognose » Thu Jun 13, 2019 5:11 am
THE CHURCH-RATE QUESTION
Mr Wm Henry Ashurst, of the Old Jewry, solicitor, was summoned by the churchwardens of the parish of St Mildred, Poultry, at the Mansion-house, for refusing to pay a church-rate of 8s 4d,- Mr Cox, vestry clerk, attended to support the summons, and proved the levying of the rate. — Mr Ashurst took an objection to the validity of the rate, and handed in a written notice that he intended to dispute it in the Ecclesiastical Court, upon which - The Lord Mayor decided that his jurisdiction was ousted, and that the churchwardens, if they wished to enforce payment, must go to that court to prove that their rate was a legal one.— Mr Cox said they would certainly do so, and the summons was then dismissed.
Mr Wm. Connell (watchmaker, Cheapside) then answered to a summons for refusing to pay a rate of £6 10s, claimed by the same churchwarden and like-wise objected to the validity of the rate, and intended to dispute it. Mr Cox: Then, perhaps, you will put in a written notice, as Mr Ashurst has done.— Mr Connell: No. I do not think that is necessary. The notice I now give is sufficient in law.—The Lord Mayor: Yes, I think so. Mr Cox: Well, we must go to the Ecclesiastical Court, But I wish to state that this rate was levied for the repairs of the church, in consequence of a complaint from the rector that it was not fit for the performance of divine service; and that the parish was polled upon the rate, which was agreed to almost unanimously; and, until to-day, no gentleman has had the conscience to come, and, in the face of day, say he would not pay the rate, and now there are only three who refuse - Mr Ashurst, Mr Connell, and Mr Beck. But Mr Connell has himself filled the office of church-warden, and attended the church, and I do not suppose that he would dispute it unless he had conscientious objections. The amount expended for the repairs was £480. for which I can produce receipts, and we shall certainly go to the Ecclesiastical Court.— Summons dismissed.
Mr Thomas Beck, of Cheapside, who was summoned for £6, made a similar objection. — Mr Cox: Do you intend to dispute the rate in the Ecclesiastical Court? - Mr Beck: Yes.— Mr Cox: I am very glad to hear you say so.- This summons, also, was therefore dismissed, and the parties then quitted the court.
Source: The North Wales Chronicle - 26th March 1859
Trev.