Postby silverport » Sat Aug 15, 2009 1:35 pm
Hello
In Christian mythology a pelican is already well known also in Hamburg — long before 1863 Carl Hagenbeck started his Zoological Park.
If shown possible maker’s mark would be enlarged to screen dimension — then its expression isn’t ornithological correct for a Biologist who claim details to be able count bird’s feathers. Also bird’s sturdiness’ isn’t in conformity to German mythological history in which storks bring babies to humans. But in this case there is one sibling — face detailed and polished — transported by bird’s beak.
It could be that this very expressive mark isn’t maker’s mark — but it could be too that this mark is a kind of signification of maker’s name? E.g. Adebar = Old German word for “Stork”; «Rosenberg ³» Vol. 2, p. 137, Nr. [2392] Adrian de Bro(e) — Master 1628, dead 1661.
They’ve need some humours in 1618 to 1648 (30 year war in Germany) to could survive mentally and physically. Maybe that’s the reason for some Symbolism?
My opinion is that «Rosenberg ³» Vol. 2, p. 268, Nr. 3186 (in silhouette of a hart an upright standing left side looking bird) is not identical or similar to here shown mark. But also not birds are shown in «Rosenberg ³» Vol. 2, p. 135, Nr. 2382/2383; p.137, Nr. 2393; p. 148, Nr. 2441.
Town mark isn’t similar but fits best «Rosenberg ³» Vol. 2, p. 130, nr. 2340 (middle XVII century).
Maker’s mark resists to be solved! Maybe further more too?
Source: «Rosenberg ³» Vol. 2, p. 129-151.
Kind regards silverport