Incorrect silver pattern description in web page

Do not post mark questions here.
newking
Posts: 1
Joined: Thu Jan 15, 2009 10:21 pm

Incorrect silver pattern description in web page

Postby newking » Thu Jan 15, 2009 10:42 pm

The web page "Gorham Flatware Patterns ~ Online Encyclopedia of Silver Marks, Hallmarks & Makers' Marks" at <http://www.925-1000.com/patterns_Gorham.html> shows a photo of Gorham's King George pattern, patented 1894, incorrectly described as Gorham's New Queens pattern (NQ photo shown below. This pattern is listed in Turner's book as patented c.1895, but all pieces I've seen & have are marked "pat.1899"). My question is, how can this web page be corrected?Image
.

Traintime
contributor
Posts: 1699
Joined: Thu Jul 30, 2015 9:44 pm

Re: Incorrect silver pattern description in web page

Postby Traintime » Wed Nov 06, 2019 4:25 pm

All the Gorham Sterling King patterns including I, II, III & George (with 1909 catalog pages) and the dates they included: https://www.sterlingflatwarefashions.co ... ham11.html

dragonflywink
co-admin
Posts: 2314
Joined: Wed Jun 22, 2005 10:42 am
Location: Orlando, Florida
Contact:

Re: Incorrect silver pattern description in web page

Postby dragonflywink » Thu Nov 07, 2019 12:50 am

Hi - welcome to the forums. Can only say that I agree that the pattern shown as 'New Queens' is actually 'King George'. Carpenter and the JCK Index also show 'New Queens' as introduced in 1895...

~Cheryl


Return to “General Questions”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 4 guests