Postby oel » Tue Nov 05, 2013 11:54 am
Hi,
Yes, it could well be that the Romanian Assay office, and their way of testing procedures and used silver standards in Romania guaranteed overall minimum 750 fineness but the German retailer who done his own testing (limited testing) found it to be 800 minimum. The German crescent moon and crown is applied by the maker/retailer or German importer and guarantees overall minimum 800 fineness.
For example when the Netherlands revised their hallmarks in 1953, a problem arose of what to with finished goods, both domestic and foreign, that were already circulating in the trade and sometimes referred to as used objects. As complete assaying procedures could damage a finished item a new set of marks was initiated for use on silver items that had undergone a limited assay. However limited assay sometimes could down grade the older, earlier or foreign applied hallmarks, I have seen British sterling (925) items with a full set of British hallmarks, imported in the Netherlands, after limited assay, stamped with the Dutch ZII mark minimum 835 fineness. I believe the reason could be if the assayer goes for the highest or 1st standard and conducts a few limited assays on the same object, if one of those test fails, the object is down graded and tested for 2nd minimum standard. If the assayer is in doubt and pressed by time, better safe than sorry, a down grade will follow.
Oel.