Postby dognose » Fri May 03, 2013 2:17 pm
Although I have absolutely no reason to doubt the attribution of the mark to Samuel Evans, I would advise caution and prefix possibly/probably Samuel Evans until there is some proof to the attribution. In this case the author may well have seen an advertisement, catalogue, billhead, or similar, that shows a reproduction of the mark. Unlike hallmarks, which in most cases are checkable, plater's marks were rarely registered and information/misinformation regarding them is passed from source to source with the root of the information being lost in time. Far too often in the past people have just cross referenced trade directories with the initials contained within a set of marks and have come to a conclusion with the lack of any other evidence to prove it, this conclusion is passed from internet website to internet website, from printed reference to printed reference and so on until it is seen so many times that we have no doubt it must be true, and maybe it is, but we must also be aware that maybe, sometimes, it's not.
Trev.