Silver pre-revolutionary St. Petersburg ring or fake?
Silver pre-revolutionary St. Petersburg ring or fake?
I would be interested in the forum members' opinion on this piece. My research suggests that the maker is Mathias Henrik Kilpeläinen and the ring was made in St. Petersburg between 1875-1898. There are several odd things about this ring, however:
1) It has no assayer's mark and as far as I can work out (this is affirmed in several places, but not conclusive), a piece of silver or gold had to have a maker's mark, town mark, quality mark and assayer's mark with date. This has all of these apart from the latter. Perhaps somebody can tell me if I'm correct in thinking that the assayer's mark was mandatory?
2) The ring itself seems very worn and dinged, but the hallmarks are relatively fresh.
3) Those squared edges of the ring seem a little rough for something that would have been a seriously luxury item.
4) The very obviously Russian Imperial double-headed eagle seems a bit too good to be true (and I can't find any examples of something similar) and the maker that it seems to be by is known mainly for spoons, lamps, salt cellars etc as far as I can tell. Who would wear something like this I wonder? The maker was not a supplier to the tsarist court (otherwise there would be a two-headed eagle hallmark too).
Re: Silver pre-revolutionary St. Petersburg ring or fake?
I would also add that it seems odd to me that the hallmarks should be on the outer side of the ring and not inside the ring. Thoughts?
Re: Silver pre-revolutionary St. Petersburg ring or fake?
I am writing only about the theory, not about the authenticity of this ring.
This type of state stamp could be used in 1882-1898. More often in 1896-1898
This type of state stamp could be used in 1882-1898. More often in 1896-1898
Re: Silver pre-revolutionary St. Petersburg ring or fake?
Thank you for the interesting information about the dates of that style of state stamp, very interesting. Do you have any thoughts on the question of whether an assayer's stamp was always present or whether it was sometimes not used?Mart wrote:I am writing only about the theory, not about the authenticity of this ring.
This type of state stamp could be used in 1882-1898. More often in 1896-1898
Re: Silver pre-revolutionary St. Petersburg ring or fake?
I wrote specifically about the type of clem without the initials of the probirer.
Re: Silver pre-revolutionary St. Petersburg ring or fake?
Such a brand can occur separately, or maybe together with the brands with the initials of the probirer
Re: Silver pre-revolutionary St. Petersburg ring or fake?
So you are saying that the kleimo of the probirer/assayer was not always added?Mart wrote:Such a brand can occur separately, or maybe together with the brands with the initials of the probirer
Re: Silver pre-revolutionary St. Petersburg ring or fake?
In Russian. Try to translate if you have a question:wiglaf wrote:So you are saying that the kleimo of the probirer/assayer was not always added?Mart wrote:Such a brand can occur separately, or maybe together with the brands with the initials of the probirer
Такой тип клейма (проба/герб города) как на перстне мог применяться самостоятельно с 1882 по 1898 годы, но чаще 1896-1898. Без присутствия клейма с инициалами пробирера.
Re: Silver pre-revolutionary St. Petersburg ring or fake?
Hi,
Unfortunately,it is modern fake.
Google for russian style imperial eagle silver ring.
(Do not expect the exact match,hundreds available in stock).
Rule of thumb: every russian imperial eagle is a fake.
Regards
Unfortunately,it is modern fake.
Google for russian style imperial eagle silver ring.
(Do not expect the exact match,hundreds available in stock).
Rule of thumb: every russian imperial eagle is a fake.
Regards
Re: Silver pre-revolutionary St. Petersburg ring or fake?
Thanks for your message. I had a feeling that it was probably unlikely to be the real deal. Always interesting to research these things, though!AG2012 wrote:Hi,
Unfortunately,it is modern fake.
Google for russian style imperial eagle silver ring.
(Do not expect the exact match,hundreds available in stock).
Rule of thumb: every russian imperial eagle is a fake.
Regards
Re: Silver pre-revolutionary St. Petersburg ring or fake?
Спасибо большое за объяснение, Март. На самом деле я по-русски разговариваю :) For the benefit of the non-Russian-speakers, it's really interesting to know that the assayer's mark was not mandatory from 1882-1898 and was most often not used in the period of 1896-1898. I had not been able to find that information anywhere else, so it's much appreciated.Mart wrote:In Russian. Try to translate if you have a question:wiglaf wrote:So you are saying that the kleimo of the probirer/assayer was not always added?Mart wrote:Such a brand can occur separately, or maybe together with the brands with the initials of the probirer
Такой тип клейма (проба/герб города) как на перстне мог применяться самостоятельно с 1882 по 1898 годы, но чаще 1896-1898. Без присутствия клейма с инициалами пробирера.
Re: Silver pre-revolutionary St. Petersburg ring or fake?
Such a stamp could be used, but not very often until 1897. In 1897, some cities received still old stamps with the initials of the probirer (for example, Odessa, Vilna), but they were not used much. In 1897 and 1898, the stamp sample/coat of arms of the city was mainly used. Next, a girl in a kokoshnik.
Good luck!
Good luck!
Re: Silver pre-revolutionary St. Petersburg ring or fake?
Thank you, Mart!Mart wrote:Such a stamp could be used, but not very often until 1897. In 1897, some cities received still old stamps with the initials of the probirer (for example, Odessa, Vilna), but they were not used much. In 1897 and 1898, the stamp sample/coat of arms of the city was mainly used. Next, a girl in a kokoshnik.
Good luck!