



I would be interested in the forum members' opinion on this piece. My research suggests that the maker is Mathias Henrik Kilpeläinen and the ring was made in St. Petersburg between 1875-1898. There are several odd things about this ring, however:
1) It has no assayer's mark and as far as I can work out (this is affirmed in several places, but not conclusive), a piece of silver or gold had to have a maker's mark, town mark, quality mark and assayer's mark with date. This has all of these apart from the latter. Perhaps somebody can tell me if I'm correct in thinking that the assayer's mark was mandatory?
2) The ring itself seems very worn and dinged, but the hallmarks are relatively fresh.
3) Those squared edges of the ring seem a little rough for something that would have been a seriously luxury item.
4) The very obviously Russian Imperial double-headed eagle seems a bit too good to be true (and I can't find any examples of something similar) and the maker that it seems to be by is known mainly for spoons, lamps, salt cellars etc as far as I can tell. Who would wear something like this I wonder? The maker was not a supplier to the tsarist court (otherwise there would be a two-headed eagle hallmark too).