Postby admin » Tue Aug 08, 2006 8:39 pm
Hi Tracy,
I recall the passage, but in truth I always took her recollections with a grain of salt.
I have difficulty believing that anyone with the business acumen of either Spratling or Antonio C. could have believed that installing a system of purity responsibility would raise anyone's production standards outside of the purity issue. The eagle was an assay system and assay only controls purity, it has no hand in taste or quality.
As to design issues, it seems unlikely that they would have felt threatened by makers of badly designed and badly made tourist trinkets. These people were at the top of their craft and they knew they produced the best. To see them threatened by junk makers is like the folks at Cartier or Harry Winston freaking out about CZ's being sold on QVC.
In reality, as serious players in the industry, I am very sure they were truly worried about, first and foremost, the unscrupulous manufacturers, large & small, selling debased silver in large quantities. This practice was causing loss of faith in the entire Mexican silver industry and was a genuine threat to their talleres.
That said, I have to admit that, in all honesty, I really do prefer Brilanti's scenario.
Regards, Tom