www.925-1000.com

Is the broken piece on the left side, toward the the front? It looks like 2 cracks there which meet just under the body of the jug. This would require a sizable rim to be applied to cover the break. It may be possible to find someone who can do the restoration by cementing the broken bit back into p...

Mahogany Obsidian, a type of volcanic "glass". It is a natural stone mined in many parts of the world. It takes a good polish, is medium in hardness, but very brittle.
.

Then it would have to be a silver mounted carved coconut, very early example. I think of them gaining popularity post-1650.
.

A bezoar? It would be a bit large for use in a single goblet, maybe it was for a ewer, hung from the curley tail. They were still popular when this was made, but their use was soon to end.
.

I only use chemical testing on pieces when I have major suspicions about the quality of the metal. For most items the chemical can not simply be applied to the surface (then you would get a reading only on any plating on the item) so the surface needs to be disturbed to get an accurate reading. I ha...

First, thank you for the additional pictures, they say a lot about the piece. The bars holding the amethyst beads in place are not what I would expect to see. They are poorly done, the ends should fill the opening completely and blend with the finish on the rest of the item. I doubt they are origion...

When judging something like this I always ask what would it have looked like as a different piece. The links appear to be angled so that if the amethysts were on opposing sides (flipping every other link) then it would form a line bracelet with the links strung using 2 chains (your picture does not ...

The stone appears to be jasper, I can not explain the blue underneath the stone. Stylize it appears to be from the mid-20's and northern Europian manufacture, though I am sure someone will chime in with a decyphering of the marks.

They would have been on neck ribbons, someone modified them by drilling the holes, the one with the attached loop would have been the origional style. They would represent: Sword=Steward, Book=Chaplain, Key=Gatekeeper, and Scroll=Lecturer. I believe they are from either a Masonic's or a Knights of P...

I believe it is from Scotland, though I can not make uot the marks well. They are often worn on tams and are set with cairgorns and other Scottish emblems.

I suspect when the item was polished the inside was not polished. First I would use a good polish and some elbow grease to see if it can be brought back to the proper finish. I am assuming that the piece is sterling. If it is plated it may not be possible to break the tarnish without removing the pl...

Mike is using the same deductions as I when he comments on the shield befitting a trophy more than a piece made for the table. Were it made as a table piece, the shield would have been a grape-leaf (left plain for engraving) to be more harmonious with the rest of the cup. If the existing insert is r...

Finding only one usually means they were shoe clips. Being on shoes it is easy to lose one of the pair. When worn on a coat it would be easy to keep track of them while for many if one came off their shoe it would not be noticed until the shoes were being removed.
.

Miles, I do not think it is a cupping cup. the shape is a bit narrow for that use. (Don't ask how I know, but trust me it is not a painful process and the heat involved is only enough to create a vacuum in the cup.) A cup would have been blown so the cut edge would be under the applied lip, it would...

Or it is a trophy cup.
.

It is either a shoe or coat clip. the agressive teeth are to hold it onto thicker material. It should have a mate.
.

When I was an apprentice the jeweler I worked under thought it was good for me to learn the Brittish Hallmark system, but he added a piece of Gorham to the pieces I had to look up... I spent hours trying to puzzel that out! He let me in on the fact that you almost never find a Brittish piece marked ...

The first impression of this ring would be a C.1900 gypsy mount with an old mine cut diamond. Looking at the marks would lead to some head-scratching. If I were researching this ring, I would have come to the same conclusions of: Assayed at London, 18Kt, 1973. Next question is how could a C.1900 rin...

All that I can think of is a case to hold the type of tissue (unlike modern tissues) which a respectable woman would use to blot oily patches on her face (as opposed to the harlots who wore make-up). They had a thin layer of a fine white or beige clay and were the precurser to today's compacts.
.

Does the rim and foot appear to have a fitting for an external bowl? I wonder if it was made as a one-off to salvage a treasured bowl that was severely damaged. The foot is what is throwing me, who would want this sitting with the outside showing. Though if it were a strainer, why put a foot on it, ...