It was great to be able to buy this teaspoons and get the chance to study it as it’s clearly from 1797 with the double duty mark but who is I.C? https://i.postimg.cc/fbhh8P4T/49-E84048-F33-F-4-AB0-A58-B-3-C1-EB716-B781.jpg https://i.postimg.cc/hGbR60g8/B8-F193-BC-7-DD2-4032-B247-9-C737429-C6-CD.jpg ...
Really nice fiddle pattern butter knife but again no idea where it’s from. Nice pseudo lion and duty stamp. The H is odd but maybe H is for Halifax? Maker is F.B. This was purchased along with the other 2 teaspoons see posts. https://i.postimg.cc/9QscxgQH/23-BC2777-F94-B-4-B9-A-9-FDF-4-DC50-E36-BC47...
This is one of three items purchased together (see the other posts) I really have no idea where this comes from? Looks Colonial or Provincial. https://i.postimg.cc/767w8HdH/8468-E5-A8-120-C-44-DE-A42-E-46-B483-CDE3-D7.jpg https://i.postimg.cc/3NT7KMQg/A6-C7-BADA-6574-4-FC7-9026-C69-DB22454-B9.jpg Matt
I finally gave in and bought these three tablespoons. As usual things like this get sold as London items, these were sold as 1798 London spoons but they aren’t. Any ideas as I’ve drawn a blank so far? The ‘date’ letter is a G not a C. The back has a slight rib at the top similar to Scottish spoons. ...
I have not come across this mark before of William Zeigler. From the marks it would appear they date around 1797-1805. Does anyone know if he made much silver?
Thanks Trev, that’s great news! 8oz is really not much. The teaspoon weighs 15g so there’s a possibility of only 16/17 teaspoons but probably much less. It would be interesting to know if like the Exeter records the list of items is known. This is nearly as good as the James Niner one of only two te...
.....In fact James Crosswood Niner of 44 King st, Devonport, Plymouth, only ever sent 2 teaspoons to assay! Here is one of them dated 1825: https://www.925-1000.com/pics/Ximg.jpg https://www.925-1000.com/pics/Ximg.jpg In his book Miles Harrison has noted that James is recorded in the assay registers...
Ok thanks Trev, the lion looked a bit odd but the 1740’s lions did vary quite a bit. I haven’t enough good marks here to check as most 1740’s marks are squashed or worn! These marks were quite good.
Forgot to update this: This ID mark is an overstamp. There are 3 marks in total! 1. The maker appears to be Charles Hougham. 2. The second overstamp is that of IL - Joh Lias, the brightcut engraving is of his work and is not original to 1790. 3. The last overstamp is that of ID. It took quite some t...