Search found 415 matches

by agphile
Mon Jan 04, 2016 11:39 am
Forum: Russian Silver
Topic: Can Anyone Identify Maker of Imperial Russian Vase Dated 1916?
Replies: 8
Views: 2619

Re: Can Anyone Identify Maker of Imperial Russian Vase Dated 1916?

A nice looking piece. Just a relatively trivial further comment. I imagine the monogram is actually in cyrillic script in which case I read it as BC intertwined (i.e. VS or SV if transliterated).
by agphile
Thu Dec 24, 2015 5:00 pm
Forum: London Hallmarks
Topic: S. Garrard teapot finial G dot H?
Replies: 4
Views: 2050

Re: S. Garrard teapot finial G dot H?

It looks like Sheffield rather than London lions passant in your photos which would tend to confirm separate origins.
by agphile
Mon Dec 21, 2015 9:20 am
Forum: Grimwade's Biographies ~ Updates
Topic: ORME, John I (Grimwade p.610)
Replies: 6
Views: 5651

Re: ORME, John I (Grimwade p.610)

Thanks Silverly. It is Heal's references to a John Orme in business in 1743 and 1744 that make me think there were two of the same name. If your references all prove to be for the one person it still leaves the 1743/44 silversmith as a possibility for my IO mark. It would be nice if your research pr...
by agphile
Sun Dec 20, 2015 5:19 pm
Forum: Grimwade's Biographies ~ Updates
Topic: ORME, John I (Grimwade p.610)
Replies: 6
Views: 5651

Re: ORME, John I (Grimwade p.610)

I guess I'm stating the obvious but I take it that this means there were two contemporaneous John Ormes, the watch chain maker of St Andrew's parish who died in 1742 and the other of St Paul's parish who is presumably the one that Heal records as still being in business in 1743 and 1744. I'm trying ...
by agphile
Thu Dec 17, 2015 7:19 am
Forum: British Hallmarks - Single Image
Topic: Fake marks?
Replies: 1
Views: 1473

Re: Fake marks?

Not genuine British marks. Without a photo of the object itself it is difficult to say whether they are outright fakes, colonial pseudo marks or fantasy marks on some historicist item.
by agphile
Wed Dec 16, 2015 9:57 am
Forum: Other Countries
Topic: Silver frame marked RC and 925
Replies: 30
Views: 18478

Re: Silver frame marked RC and 925

I agree that the 1817 marks are incompatible with the style of the frame. I suspect they are fakes rather than transpositions - or they may be transposed fakes. I am really more familiar with earlier silver but what hits me in the eye is that the leopard's head looks quite wrong. Detail of the face ...
by agphile
Tue Dec 15, 2015 1:38 pm
Forum: Russian Silver
Topic: Authentic or fake Faberge? Cigarette Case
Replies: 60
Views: 21133

Re: Authentic or fake Faberge? Cigarette Case

I sympathise. I am supposed to be able to speak Russian but avoid doing so or writing in the language because I am so out of practice that I am certain to make mistakes. I have to respect those with the courage to use my native language when it is not their own.
by agphile
Tue Dec 15, 2015 12:23 pm
Forum: Russian Silver
Topic: Authentic or fake Faberge? Cigarette Case
Replies: 60
Views: 21133

Re: Authentic or fake Faberge? Cigarette Case

Goldstein

I intervene with some trepidation but, as a native English speaker, I would have to say that your words were at best ambiguous. They carried the same meaning to me as they did to Qrt.S whatever your intention may have been.
by agphile
Tue Dec 15, 2015 6:55 am
Forum: Russian Silver
Topic: Authentic or fake Faberge? Cigarette Case
Replies: 60
Views: 21133

Re: Authentic or fake Faberge? Cigarette Case

I think Dad was referring to the marks on the first photos that started this topic, not the marks with HB in later posts. His excerpt from the Ivanov book doesn't touch on this. I am more persuaded by AG2012 et al about the original object in question but don't claim the expertise for my opinion to ...
by agphile
Fri Dec 04, 2015 1:47 pm
Forum: London Hallmarks
Topic: Cream boat London early 1700s? Faux? Worn and Tricky hallmarks
Replies: 4
Views: 1945

Re: Cream boat London early 1700s? Faux? Worn and Tricky hallmarks

I think Trev may have it. I too felt that the second initial could not be a T but had not got as far in exploring the other possibilities (was looking at JDs and not feeling they could be right!).
by agphile
Fri Nov 27, 2015 1:09 pm
Forum: Gold - Single Image
Topic: Interesting Russian (Soviet) Gold Ring
Replies: 5
Views: 3391

Re: Interesting Russian (Soviet) Gold Ring

In the other mark I suspect the 3 is actually a cyrillic Z so transliterated the mark would read 9ZK. 9 is likely to stand for the year (perhaps 1969 or 1979) and ZK would identify the workshop that made the piece, but I don't have any references for specific Soviet makers. One of our Russian expert...
by agphile
Mon Nov 23, 2015 8:46 am
Forum: Silverplate Trademarks - Worldwide
Topic: Russian MMET signs - what do they mean
Replies: 10
Views: 6780

Re: Russian MMET signs - what do they mean

Identifying the maker of an item from its mark is often a matter of looking at the probabilities when hard documentary evidence is lacking. As well as reading the linked topic I have done a bit of searching of my own which leads me to think Mstera Jewellers are the probable makers. Note that I gave ...
by agphile
Mon Nov 23, 2015 6:30 am
Forum: Silverplate Trademarks - Worldwide
Topic: Russian MMET signs - what do they mean
Replies: 10
Views: 6780

Re: Russian MMET signs - what do they mean

I should have added that the term Jeweller is used in Russian with a wider meaning than in English so can be read as silversmith though covering work in base metals as well.
by agphile
Mon Nov 23, 2015 6:25 am
Forum: Silverplate Trademarks - Worldwide
Topic: Russian MMET signs - what do they mean
Replies: 10
Views: 6780

Re: Russian MMET signs - what do they mean

I'm afraid I don't quite agree about the interpretation of ЮММЕТ. There are two parts to the mark which are sometimes separated by the date code. For instance, I have an example with ЮМ4МЕТ where I think the 4 is for 1974, but it could be 1964. The second, МЕТ part will indeed indicate a base metal ...
by agphile
Thu Nov 12, 2015 1:29 pm
Forum: London Hallmarks
Topic: Solomon Hougham's brother Charles Hollinshed?
Replies: 1
Views: 1052

Re: Solomon Hougham's brother Charles Hollinshed?

Looks like 1784 which is too early for Hollinshead.

I started offering comment before I spotted that you had some linked enquiries. I am wondering whether some of the pieces are later decorated but, as I have said in my earlier comment, hollow ware is not really my specialism.

David
by agphile
Thu Nov 12, 2015 1:12 pm
Forum: London Hallmarks
Topic: Rubbed Hallmarks sugar bowl, anyone who can guess year-range?
Replies: 1
Views: 1084

Re: Rubbed Hallmarks sugar bowl, anyone who can guess year-range?

Looks like the crowned leopard's head and the lion passant used from 1756 onwards. If there is not even a shadow of a duty mark that would give you 1756 to 1783 as a date range. I am not sufficiently "in" to hollow ware to attempt to date more precisely by the style of the piece. Good luck...
by agphile
Thu Oct 29, 2015 1:10 pm
Forum: General Questions
Topic: Shapes of the flatware through the time
Replies: 3
Views: 2260

Re: Shapes of the flatware through the time

Hello Amena There are several books that are useful for British silver but I only know one covering European spoons as a whole that I think worth recommending: "European Spoons before 1700 " by John Emery. It is out of print so you would need to look for second hand copies and, as you see,...
by agphile
Mon Oct 26, 2015 9:48 am
Forum: London Hallmarks
Topic: London 1730
Replies: 9
Views: 3816

Re: London 1730

I think it also worth remembering that Eden entered his sterling mark in 1720. I would expect him to have used it when appropriate thereafter (though of course exceptions can occur).
by agphile
Sat Oct 24, 2015 5:05 am
Forum: London Hallmarks
Topic: 1683 London, maker "M" ????
Replies: 5
Views: 2346

Re: 1683 London, maker "M" ????

Now that Trevor points it out I can see the faint bar of the T. Interesting. I still don't recall seeing the mark on spoons and can't suggest an attribution.
by agphile
Fri Oct 23, 2015 3:55 am
Forum: London Hallmarks
Topic: 1683 London, maker "M" ????
Replies: 5
Views: 2346

Re: 1683 London, maker "M" ????

I'm afraid I don't recognise the mark. A single initial is unusual. Might the fact that the M is off-centre suggest a thin letter such as I in front of it? However, that takes me no closer to suggesting a name. Sorry!

Go to advanced search