www.925-1000.com

Hi, I think it is perfectly genuine in spite of gaps in regard of documented artels after 1908 (Artels 22 23 25 28 29). So called missing artels must have existed because there is no logic in skipping sequence when artels were registered. Hello! Thank you for the prompt response(s). The purse certa...

Update: after re-examining the tiny marks and messing around with the contrast and clarity, I think what I'm seeing is another kokoshnik mark with the top half a '4', the bottom half of an '8', a heavily worn and tarnished face and a delta at the bottom. This piece of chain link is minuscule. Howeve...

Disclaimer: I can imagine this is a fake. It's hard to tell what the purse originally looked like as there has been much work done to it since it was crafted (it would appear). I can't say that it's a particularly beautiful piece, though again who knows what it once looked like. There are potentiall...