

dognose wrote:Hi,
The marks are correct and as they should be. The item was assayed at London in 1969 and the marks shown are the secondary ones, the full set being applied to main body.
Why would you want to damage the piece by performing an acid test to it?
Trev.
zilverik wrote:Hi,
Not familiar with any of the marks. Any other marks somewhere? Could this be a set of pseudomarks?
Regards,
Zilverik

