www.925-1000.com

Thank you for the information!

We can say it's fake to put an end to this because I did not intend to get on this forum to discuss the authenticity. I wanted information regarding the monogram. If you look at the monogram of the coffee pot you can clearly see it's not the same as for the other items in the lot, the markings are n...

It's the coffee pot from that lot, and yes, I know the other ones are fake but they are not marked Fabergé. The coffee pot I purchased as a single item only. I did not buy it from Sotheby's, I do not want to share the information about where I purchased it from - but yes, it's from Switzerland.

Thank you for the responce. That's actually an acceptable answer that make some sence. As I wrote in my first post in this topic, I were more interested in knowing the monogram than "authenticity" because I already have had it evaluated in 4 different locations for authenticity as well as ...

Hi monogram - your answer is the proof that you did not understand what is here written. dognose explained extra the word "detachable" for you - in vain.(try google translater...) Please do not quote every answer - we all can read! It really is enough now - believe what you want but never...

dognose wrote:No, you mis-understand, the spout and handle are separate parts and thus should be marked.

Trev.

They never are, so no.

http://www.sothebys.com/en/auctions/eca ... t.267.html

Hi Monogram, I am no expert on Russian silver, but one thing I have learnt over the years is that under Russian legislation every detachable part on a piece of silverware must be marked. 'Detachable' that is, pre-assembly, anything that has to soldered, hinged, riveted, etc. must be marked. Trev. T...

Hi monogram - you have a source for your assertion? Surely not! I have said all I have to say - now use your common sense. Furthe discussions lead nowhere. Be happy with your Fauxbergé... http://i529.photobucket.com/albums/dd334/Postnicov/476_1jen1000.jpg http://i529.photobucket.com/albums/dd334/P...

This does not have anything to do with your claim regarding the marks on the "handle". You did not answer my questions. As you said; if you dont have a picture of it - it never excisted. You claim it's marked both "Moscow" and "St. Petersburg"? No, it's not, the double ...

Hi monogram - I do not know how much knowledge about Russian hallmarking laws/habits you have. Faberg´worked in Russia, therefore the laws were mandatory for him like any other silversmith too. Just a refresher: every single part of an object consisting of several parts had to be marked. Example: ...

Not best pictures but you can see all marks are at one single item. Ridicilous.

Now we can focuse on the monogram?

What are you talking about? It's not fake. But sure, you are right and all high-end auction houses are wrong. And as you write, some are real, some are fake. I got a real one. You should do your homework before coming with such comments.

Thank you!

Here's one more picture.

Would someone be able to help me regarding this monogram? I do not know what it stands for? I think it's Russian Tsar because of the crown located over the monogram. The Fabergé item was made 1895 and are indeed authentic (confirmed by specialists and auction houses), so there's no need to discuss ...