Page 1 of 1

George III (?) Mark Identification

Posted: Sun May 07, 2017 10:43 pm
by zafer
We are having a hard time identifying the date, maker, and location for a small silver mustard spoon. We think that it is a George III, sterling, c. 1811-12(?). There is no crown and we don’t know what year the Q is for. We can’t make out the maker because it is too faint. Any help on this identification would be much appreciated.

Image

Re: George III (?) Mark Identification

Posted: Mon May 08, 2017 3:14 am
by AG2012
Hi,
Could be William & Samuel Knight, London, flatware silversmiths.
1811.
Regards
Image

Image

Re: George III (?) Mark Identification

Posted: Mon May 08, 2017 3:26 am
by AG2012
For better comparison

Image

Image

Re: George III (?) Mark Identification

Posted: Mon May 08, 2017 10:13 am
by zafer
Wow good sleuthing! You can definitely see the "wells" of the W and S and lower K now that you put a crisper engraving next to it.

One thing that confused us was that the crown stamp is missing on this piece, so how would you be able to identify it as London-made?

Re: George III (?) Mark Identification

Posted: Mon May 08, 2017 10:33 am
by AG2012
Hello again.
Leopard`s head for London assay office was often omitted on small items at the time to prevent fraudulent transposition of the marks.
Tax paid on your spoon by weight and then back in the workshop incorporated (soldered) into much heavier object. Makes sense, right ?
Regards

Re: George III (?) Mark Identification

Posted: Tue May 09, 2017 11:09 am
by zafer
Oh okay, so they'd make items like these and get them unstamped to avoid taxes. Then they'd put them into a bigger object, which would help them avoid some of the costs.

Re: George III (?) Mark Identification

Posted: Tue May 09, 2017 11:41 am
by AG2012
Hello again,
Misunderstanding.
The tax was paid on the spoon and the spoon was legally assayed at London Assay Office with city mark (leopard`s head crowned) deliberately omitted by the assayer to prevent transposing marks onto a larger object. Because larger objects had to bear full set of marks, therefore the spoon without city mark was useless to be incorporated (soldered) onto larger objects.

Transposing marks was against the law.
Regards

Re: George III (?) Mark Identification

Posted: Tue May 09, 2017 11:48 am
by zafer
Ah I understand now! Somebody would make a cheaper small object to obtain the mark. Then remove that chunk with the mark and attach it to a larger object to make it look like the stamp was already paid. Sneaky!