I'm trying to identify the maker of this folding fruit knife 'G.H', but I've searched various sources including the on-line facilities and can't find a reference to it. The combination of the trefoil duty mark and letter-box lion passant makes me think this is a Sheffield piece between 1797 and 1804. I'd be grateful for anyone's thoughts on who this maker might be.
It comes with a similar fork but it doesn't have a maker's mark, has a simple oval duty mark and a differently-struck lion.
They both come in a fitted case and look very similar in design, so I assume (perhaps incorrectly) they were made by the same maker either just before 1897 or in 1805. Any thoughts on a closer date would be helpful as well.
Many thanks.
Possible Sheffield maker G.H - help needed
Re: Possible Sheffield maker G.H - help needed
Hi SilverK,
At this period, there were two 'GH''s registered with the Sheffield Assay Office. George Hawley registered a 'GH' punch, with no pellet, on the 22nd January 1784, and George Hague registered a 'G.H' punch, with a base line pellet, on the 12th March 1798. Your pellet is centred (G·H) and matches no registered mark at Sheffield at this time that I can find.
The trefoil Duty mark, to my knowledge, was only used from July 1797 until May 1798, so both makers are candidates, but to me the lettering on George Hague's registered mark, more closely resembles the lettering on your example. It is quite likely that he had several punches and as the only other Sheffield entrant had none, the position of the pellet may not have seemed critical at the time.
There will almost certainly be full marking on these pieces, but the other marks will be on the tang.
See: http://www.925-1000.com/forum/viewtopic.php?t=5545
and: http://www.925-1000.com/forum/viewtopic ... 31&p=15531
Trev.
At this period, there were two 'GH''s registered with the Sheffield Assay Office. George Hawley registered a 'GH' punch, with no pellet, on the 22nd January 1784, and George Hague registered a 'G.H' punch, with a base line pellet, on the 12th March 1798. Your pellet is centred (G·H) and matches no registered mark at Sheffield at this time that I can find.
The trefoil Duty mark, to my knowledge, was only used from July 1797 until May 1798, so both makers are candidates, but to me the lettering on George Hague's registered mark, more closely resembles the lettering on your example. It is quite likely that he had several punches and as the only other Sheffield entrant had none, the position of the pellet may not have seemed critical at the time.
There will almost certainly be full marking on these pieces, but the other marks will be on the tang.
See: http://www.925-1000.com/forum/viewtopic.php?t=5545
and: http://www.925-1000.com/forum/viewtopic ... 31&p=15531
Trev.
Re: Possible Sheffield maker G.H - help needed
Hi Trev,
Thanks very much for your very informative reply. It certainly sounds as though George Hague could be the silversmith.
Regarding the use of the cusped duty mark (including the trefoil), readers may be interested in the article from Tony Dove which he wrote in The Finial some ten years ago. I'm not sure how the thinking has progressed since then, though. Here's the link:
http://www.bexfield.co.uk/thefinial/v14-04/pg04.htm
Thanks very much for your very informative reply. It certainly sounds as though George Hague could be the silversmith.
Regarding the use of the cusped duty mark (including the trefoil), readers may be interested in the article from Tony Dove which he wrote in The Finial some ten years ago. I'm not sure how the thinking has progressed since then, though. Here's the link:
http://www.bexfield.co.uk/thefinial/v14-04/pg04.htm
Re: Possible Sheffield maker G.H - help needed
Indeed, it would have been later than the 19th April 1798, the first day of use of the cusped mark following receipt of the new duty punch from London. (Sheffield Assay Office Day Book).
Trev.
Trev.