www.925-1000.com

In the future, you need to embed the images as not everyone will open links. But I’m carelessly daring like a drunken sailor so here’s your singular photo for all 2 sea:

It’s possible that one of the longer-lived German makers could have effected a change of marks. And the large “G” might also represent Gebruder for a firm of brothers. Nothing in the listed German marks under “G” or “k” seemed to be an exact match.

Here’s another with 900 visible: https://www.925-1000.com/forum/viewtopi ... ks#p174406

No images for 700, but Silverport mentioned 600 also exists: https://www.925-1000.com/forum/viewtopi ... 700#p50172

This one has .900 (see enlarged image): https://www.925-1000.com/forum/viewtopi ... 00#p189361

Herein a clear image for .800 (Arabic representation of 80): https://www.925-1000.com/forum/viewtopi ... pt#p185699

Just to be clear…technically there is no “hallmark” found here. That is to say, no authorized authority seems to be regulating the application of marks related to a fineness standard. More like self regulation by the maker. Mark 1 is likely just a maker mark of initials. It is incuse gothic letters ...

Another version of alleged [PV] 0.935 sample here: https://www.925-1000.com/forum/viewtopi ... 91#p213691

Re-posting images of alleged [PV] 0.935 sample:

Mooooo-ved this time for your grazing pleasure:

Direct link to original source site: https://www.silvercollection.it/LOMBARD ... MARKS.html

Mark 2 seems to be sample #73 in the link repeated here: https://www.925-1000.com/forum/viewtopi ... ey#p207475

See Amena’s final comment to denote prescribed shape (round) of silversmith’s mark in given era: https://www.925-1000.com/forum/viewtopi ... rd#p198640

Thank you…now leads us to sample [# 63] of heptagonal mark of seven stars surrounding numeral (here): https://www.925-1000.com/forum/viewtopi ... ey#p207475

And of course, that’s only a wild guess at this point lacking many images and not exactly matching descriptions like rectangular surrounds. So this could be way off still.

Also mentioned in here as “Estella Fleeting”: https://www.925-1000.com/forum/viewtopi ... ing#p88179

Marks relate (?) to Spanish .750 with “Comet” for second standard rather than the “Shooting Star” of first fineness:
https://www.925-1000.com/forum/viewtopi ... on#p149038

Cleaning up mark 2 would be helpful here. The location of where the stand surfaced might tell a lot as a SHEFFIELD stamp can either be an export/import mark before actual country of origin was required, or it might be part of the larger scam that was carried on by American manufacturers to give fals...

Back to square 1….Why would the crown be sideways? Why does the crown seem to have pips rather than sections in the lower half? Could it be that this is not a crown at all? This leads to… Is that first mark even a crescent, or could it be a partial of something else? Further, If a shield contained t...

In the more common form, the third of three like objects goes to the base of the shield. This is completely reversed, assuming the objects are the same. That would have to be the key to identifying it, unless this were not a shield at all.