Hi and welcome to the forum.
This date letter v is for the assay year 1938/39 so it just pre-dates WW2. I can shed no light on the Indian connection.
Phil
Search found 1609 matches
- Thu Oct 12, 2023 3:36 am
- Forum: Sheffield Hallmarks
- Topic: Joseph Rodgers & Sons tea set
- Replies: 7
- Views: 1005
- Sun Oct 08, 2023 4:39 pm
- Forum: London Hallmarks
- Topic: Can anyone help confirm date mark
- Replies: 3
- Views: 938
Re: Can anyone help confirm date mark
This date letter is actually b - for 1957. The maker is C J Vander Ltd.
Phil
Phil
- Fri Oct 06, 2023 2:25 am
- Forum: London Hallmarks
- Topic: Sterling Silver Ladle circa-1720
- Replies: 6
- Views: 938
Re: Sterling Silver Ladle circa-1720
GO is James Goodwin, this mark registered in 1710. The ladle is Britannia standard silver which accounts for the mark comprising the first two letters of the silversmith's name.
Phil
Phil
- Tue Sep 26, 2023 10:36 am
- Forum: British Hallmarks - Single Image
- Topic: Maker's mark interpretation, please
- Replies: 2
- Views: 884
Re: Maker's mark interpretation, please
Hi and welcome to the forum.
Yes this is a London 1912 hallmark (more accurately 1912/13 as the assay year did not correspond with the calendar year). The maker's / sponsor's mark is that of Edward Barnard & Sons Ltd.
Phil
Yes this is a London 1912 hallmark (more accurately 1912/13 as the assay year did not correspond with the calendar year). The maker's / sponsor's mark is that of Edward Barnard & Sons Ltd.
Phil
- Tue Sep 26, 2023 9:04 am
- Forum: British Hallmarks - Single Image
- Topic: Help with Ebenezer Oliphant mark
- Replies: 4
- Views: 2394
Re: Help with Ebenezer Oliphant mark
I just re-read what I wrote and realise I got it back to front: "they show Oliphant's mark with a script E rather than a normal E" should have read "they show Oliphant's mark with a normal E rather than a script E". Apologies to anyone who was confused about what is shown in the ...
- Tue Sep 26, 2023 3:24 am
- Forum: British Hallmarks - Single Image
- Topic: Help with Ebenezer Oliphant mark
- Replies: 4
- Views: 2394
Re: Help with Ebenezer Oliphant mark
It's certainly Edinburgh, 1747 and Oliphant's working dates quoted by the Edinburgh Incorporation of Goldsmiths (1737 to 1766) fit nicely. The only caveat is that they show Oliphant's mark with a script E rather than a normal E.
Phil
Phil
- Mon Sep 04, 2023 5:20 pm
- Forum: Mystery Objects
- Topic: Mystery Markings
- Replies: 1
- Views: 929
Re: Mystery Markings
Hi and welcome to the Forum. Images of marks and the items they are on are essential for questions to be answered properly. The following should help you: How to Add Images Posting Requirements https://postimages.org is recommended (click 'Share', then copy and paste the 'Hotlink for forums' code to...
- Fri Sep 01, 2023 1:47 pm
- Forum: European Jewelry
- Topic: .925 chain Chester?
- Replies: 2
- Views: 875
Re: .925 chain Chester?
Hi and welcome to the forum.
This is actually a London hallmark with the date letter H for 1982. There are no published references for modern maker's/sponsor's marks and at the moment we are unable to identify S-LC.
Phil
This is actually a London hallmark with the date letter H for 1982. There are no published references for modern maker's/sponsor's marks and at the moment we are unable to identify S-LC.
Phil
- Tue Aug 15, 2023 5:25 pm
- Forum: Birmingham Hallmarks
- Topic: Birmingham, N&H, Silver Bowl - Help
- Replies: 3
- Views: 1385
Re: Birmingham, N&H, Silver Bowl - Help
As suggested the date letter is "t" for 1893. At this period Birmingham Assay Office used 2 styles of punch shapes, the rectangle with cut corners as on your bowl and an oval. I suspect that the deciding factor for which style to use is the size of the piece with the oval used for larger p...
- Mon Aug 14, 2023 2:05 am
- Forum: Birmingham Hallmarks
- Topic: FGW Birmingham
- Replies: 7
- Views: 3381
Re: FGW Birmingham
The engraving on the tankard is the coat of arms of the city of Birmingham so it is likely that it was made as a commissioned presentation piece and does not signify anything in relation to the maker.
Phil
Phil
- Sat Aug 05, 2023 1:46 am
- Forum: London Hallmarks
- Topic: trouble with the 1776 and 1816 series marks - London
- Replies: 1
- Views: 1467
Re: trouble with the 1776 and 1816 series marks - London
Not a problem - just pay attention to details of the whole hallmark: 1776-1784 (a-i) - no duty mark 1784,1785 (i,k) - incuse duty mark 1786-1795 (l-u) - crowned leopard's head town mark + duty mark 1816-1821 (a-f) - crowned leopard's head town mark + duty mark 1821-1835 (f-u) - uncrowned leopard's h...
- Wed Aug 02, 2023 9:45 am
- Forum: Silverplate Trademarks - Worldwide
- Topic: Help with Grandmother's 'silver' tea service
- Replies: 4
- Views: 1468
Re: Help with Grandmother's 'silver' tea service
Welcome to the forum, Robert. Images of marks and the items they are on are essential for questions to be answered properly. The following should help you: How to Add Images Posting Requirements https://postimages.org is recommended (click 'Share', then copy and paste the 'Hotlink for forums' code t...
- Mon Jul 31, 2023 5:37 pm
- Forum: British Hallmarks - Single Image
- Topic: Hallmark on an old flintlock
- Replies: 2
- Views: 3000
Re: Hallmark on an old flintlock
It looks more like "l" for 1746/47 than "r" for 1752/53. TR is probably Thomas Rush.
Phil
Phil
- Thu Jul 13, 2023 12:13 pm
- Forum: Sheffield Hallmarks
- Topic: Looking for maker "IL"
- Replies: 2
- Views: 2171
Re: Looking for maker "IL"
This mark is not shown in the standard reference for Sheffield marks, "The Sheffield Assay Office Register" by B W Watson published in 1911. It may be a mark of Joseph Law who was active at the time. I have seen this mark before, on an 1827 fruit knife, but have left the identity as just &...
- Sun Jul 09, 2023 1:10 pm
- Forum: British Hallmarks - Single Image
- Topic: Help identifying maker's mark BC
- Replies: 2
- Views: 2405
Re: Help identifying maker's mark BC
This mark hasn't been recorded by Grimwade. There is, however, a BC mark in his "Unregistered Marks" section. It is shown as BC in conjoined circles and noted as seen on a 1734 brandy saucepan. As it was taken from a real-life example it is possible that the original was actually the same ...
- Sat Jul 08, 2023 6:51 am
- Forum: European Jewelry
- Topic: Birmingham marked brooch/pin
- Replies: 1
- Views: 1090
Re: Birmingham marked brooch/pin
I agree Joseph Cook. The date letter is "i" for 1883; it is not immediately obvious as "i" as the dot and the base of the letter have merged together with wear and polishing. Watch fobs and brooches were mass-produced in a series of designs. Here the maker has increased the scope...
- Sat Jul 08, 2023 6:43 am
- Forum: Silver Jewelry - Single Image
- Topic: Birmingham makers marks 1880's
- Replies: 6
- Views: 4434
Re: Birmingham makers marks 1880's
The mark before the anchor is the date letter. This is the i for 1883; it is not immediately obvious as "i" as the dot and the base of the letter have merged together with wear and polishing.
- Fri Jun 30, 2023 6:26 pm
- Forum: London Hallmarks
- Topic: 17th cent. English Tankard - maker ??
- Replies: 4
- Views: 1484
- Mon Jun 26, 2023 12:02 pm
- Forum: Russian Silver
- Topic: Mocha spoons Soviet Union
- Replies: 12
- Views: 3277
- Tue Jun 20, 2023 1:36 am
- Forum: European Jewelry
- Topic: help with this mark
- Replies: 1
- Views: 1184
Re: help with this mark
Hi and welcome to the Forum. Images of marks and the items they are on are essential for questions to be answered properly. The following should help you: How to Add Images Posting Requirements https://postimages.org is recommended (click 'Share', then copy and paste the 'Hotlink for forums' code to...