www.925-1000.com

Ubaranda wrote:
Hello!
Information about Frolov and Ushatov is correct.

Hi. Tell me, please. Where you took information about Frolov and Ushatov?

Hi.

About "Z".
Such punches meet not seldom. Letters or figures. It belong to technological process. Are used for marking of parts, lots and etc.

AG2012 wrote:The assayer MK was Mihail Karinsky PL 1165 and 1166.
In office 1825 - 1838.

In 1838 year Karpinskialready did not work at the Petersburg assay office.
Dmitry Tverskoy replaced Karpinski in February, 1837. ))

Qrt.S wrote:In addition, most likely the customs brought it there. In other words an imported object.

Qrt.S,
You are incorrigible (((
It is the wrong conclusion. See above.
The customs at that time sent nothing to an assay office. The customs had no such duty.

About "import". I think, it is necessary to divide concepts. There is import of products for sale through customs. It is official import with the corresponding procedures and attributes. But, silver products can be brought (from foreing) privately, as personal, own. Then, it was brought in...

@Dad, Unfortunately I cannot find/I don't have the Decree 7517 of February 22, 1732) where it is stated that the silver fineness could be 75 zolotnik. Nonetheless, 75 was applied for gold coins only (1718). During the 18th century there was many "standards" for silver 62, 70, 72, 77...The...

AG2012 wrote: ......But, were the measurements so precise at the time ?
......

It should be noted that St. Petersburg the assay office was created on the basis of the new St. Petersburg Mint. The St. Petersburg experts were the best.

Hi It is made in Hamburg during earlier period of time. Then, in the 1770th the Petersburg assay office marked it by russian punches. 75 – it is purity of silver (zolotnik). (Decree 7517 of February 22, 1732) At this time (1770th) a usual set of punches guaranteed the minimum purity of silver - 72 z...

Dear Ort's. Why you argue? I thought that you already accepted the fact: in 1882 the hallmarks of the Russian Empire was changed only in additive of "notches" in an old type of marks. And now you forgot again?)) Assay Law of 1882 told about marks for import silver very little. I don't know...

Yes. Qrt.S are right. It's russian import mark (84, eagle,ПТ). But, period before 1882.
"Eagle" - assay office mark. Most possibly it is Warsaw.
Country of producing was Germany. ( most possibly)

Best Reg...

Hi. These was made by factory of Nikolay Efimovich Shebanov (Николай Ефимович Шебанов ). Moscow. Factory was founded in 1830. Main products was the samovars, tea sets, etc.., produced by silverplate technic. "Silverplate" is russian "Накладное серебро" ( Laid silver (Cover silver...

Hi, Excuse me for comparison, but your dispute is like the fight of eaters of eggs at the Lilliput and Blefuscu .)) Ivan Vikhlyaev (Иван Вихляев) was the Head of the Moscow Assay Office during this period of time His initials in the punches are " IB " (Иван = Iоанн). The town mark (Saint G...

Hi

Punches looks like original (from this foto). Mikhail Ovchinnikov, St.-Petersburg. 1899-1908.
But. Will better, if you could made new fotos of hallmarks.

Best Reg..

Hi

This hallmarks looks like fals marks.
I think the item is from "pseudo jewish theme".

Best Reg..

Hi

This marks (on the ring) are fals marks. Modern fake.

Blakstone.
Fine research. My congratulations!

Hi

This sugar bowl was made by “Imago Artis” Krakow.

http://www.joulenka.pl/stara-bizuteria- ... sygnatury/

This Belt Buckle was made in Novocherkassk 1882-1899.
It isn't " part of the national costume ". It was souvenir for the memory of the Caucasus.
You see an inscription on a buckle - "Кавказ" (Caucasus)

AG2012 wrote:Hi,
Made in Kharkov after 1958.
Given by papa and mama for birthday.
Regards

Hello

Tou are wrong. It was made in Viet Nam. Import to the USSR.
Very much lots of low qualiti silver was imported to USSR in 1950-60 .
Very knowlege design.

In maker mark - А.Г.Ш. , maker from Moscow, 1908 - .... . In Ivanov's book there are Абрам Гаврилович Шпаер ( Abram Gavrilovich Shpaer ). But, i don't trust him... )))